Migration Policy Modernization Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes strengthen national cohesion, security, and economic planning by ensuring newcomers integrate effectively, meet clear standards, and contribute sustainably.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Integration Requirements |
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
Standard language/civics requirements
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
|
| 4 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Annual quotas with caps
|
|
| 5 | Asylum & Refugees |
Strict processing, limited support
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
1
Integration Requirements2
Citizenship Requirements3
Deportation4
Immigration Quota Policy5
Asylum & RefugeesProposer
Party
National Conservative
The National Conservative Party stands guard over tradition law and faith with iron will and unshaken roots.
Core pillars
King Henry I
Activist · Age 37
A former high-flying banker who left finance after witnessing firsthand the corrosive effects of unchecked liberal policies, Henry Wilson traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using his financial acumen and silver-tongued charm to rally disillusioned voters around pragmatic solutions.
Timeline
-
Draft6 April 2024
-
Vote Open6 April 2024
-
Vote Closed5 June 2024
-
Became Law5 June 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House Of Commons
PassedFor: 176 / 240 seats (73.3%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 58 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 20 | Yes | Most of The things are acceptable and important for The safety of the state |
| Iron Pillars | 33 | Yes | Looks good to me keep the border safe. |
| Labour | 66 | Yes | Fine. We will accept this proposal...for now |
| National Conservative Proposer | 38 | Yes | No reason given |
| Nationalist Future | 19 | Yes | we need to protect our borders |
| Technocratic Union | 58 | Abstain | No reason given |
House Of Representatives
PassedFor: 24 / 48 seats (50.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 17 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 0 | Yes | Most of The things are acceptable and important for The safety of the state |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Looks good to me keep the border safe. |
| Labour | 5 | Yes | Fine. We will accept this proposal...for now |
| National Conservative Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | Yes | we need to protect our borders |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
Prime Minister
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Looks good to me keep the border safe.”
“Fine. We will accept this proposal...for now”
“we need to protect our borders”
“Most of The things are acceptable and important for The safety of the state”