These reforms will boost economic growth by removing barriers to housing and transport investment, stimulating private sector development and improving urban mobility.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rent Control |
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
No controls; market sets rents
|
|
| 2 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Balanced planning system
|
Market-led, deregulated planning
|
|
| 3 | Public Transport Policy |
Public transport priority (car restrictions in city centres; free transit)
|
Ban public transport; only private vehicles permitted
|
Party
The National Conservative Party stands guard over tradition law and faith with iron will and unshaken roots.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 37
A former high-flying banker who left finance after witnessing firsthand the corrosive effects of unchecked liberal policies, Henry Wilson traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using his financial acumen and silver-tongued charm to rally disillusioned voters around pragmatic solutions.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 49 / 240 seats (20.4%)
Against: 152 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 39
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | Abstain | Great direction on deregulation. Abstaining on this version due to the transit restriction, but open to supporting a revised bill. |
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | Good bill can help us in the long run. |
| Labour | 65 | No | This would have catastrophic effects on the economy and the environment |
| National Conservative Proposer | 26 | Yes | No reason given |
| Technocratic Union | 87 | No | Deregulating rent and planning has efficiency merit, but banning public transport outright ignores urban mobility and congestion data |
For: 19 / 48 seats (39.6%)
Against: 22 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | Abstain | Great direction on deregulation. Abstaining on this version due to the transit restriction, but open to supporting a revised bill. |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Good bill can help us in the long run. |
| Labour | 5 | No | This would have catastrophic effects on the economy and the environment |
| National Conservative Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | Deregulating rent and planning has efficiency merit, but banning public transport outright ignores urban mobility and congestion data |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Deregulating rent and planning has efficiency merit, but banning public transport outright ignores urban mobility and congestion data”
“Good bill can help us in the long run.”
“Great direction on deregulation. Abstaining on this version due to the transit restriction, but open to supporting a revised bill.”
“Good economic vision on deregulation, but outright banning public transit hurts working folks and limits real choice. We want free markets, not state mandates on how people commute.”
“This would have catastrophic effects on the economy and the environment”