Mandatory Vaccination Act With Exemptions of 2023 - Elrondia

Rationale

Mandatory vaccination with exemptions maximizes community immunity, reducing preventable disease outbreaks and protecting public health.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Vaccination Policy	Strongly recommended, not compelled		Mandatory with medical/conscience exemptions

1

Vaccination Policy

Previous law

Strongly recommended, not compelled

Mandatory with medical/conscience exemptions

Proposer

Party

Labour

Labour forges paths where no one stands alone. Equal liberty in every voice a rising tide of shared strength.

Core pillars

Ethan Thornton

Activist · Age 58

48,416 social followers

Raised in a mining town where his father lost his job to outsourcing, Ethan Thornton built a reputation as a union negotiator who never took a bribe, his working-class grit and unshakable integrity earning him loyalty among both workers and sceptics alike.

✨ Charismatic 🛡️ Incorruptible 🤐 Poor Speaker ⚖️ Pragmatist 🔨 Working Class Background

Timeline

Draft

7 May 2023
Vote Open

7 May 2023
Vote Closed

6 July 2023
Did Not Become Law

6 July 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

House Of Commons

Passed

153Yes 72No 15Not voted 240 seats

For: 153 / 240 seats (63.8%)

Against: 72 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 68.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Freedom Alliance	0	No	The Freedom Alliance opposes mandatory medical interventions. While public health is important, bodily autonomy and personal liberty are paramount rights that the government must not infringe upon. Vaccination decisions should be based on voluntary consent and individual responsibility, not state compulsion.
Iron Pillars	33	No	People should have the right to choose whether to be vaccinated or not.
Labour Proposer	55	Yes	No reason given
National Conservative	39	No	it is the individuals choice wether they want to vacine
Technocratic Union	98	Yes	Immunization is a matter of collective public health rather than individual preference

House Of Representatives

Passed

22Yes 19No 7Not voted 48 seats

For: 22 / 48 seats (45.8%)

Against: 19 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 53.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Freedom Alliance	0	No	The Freedom Alliance opposes mandatory medical interventions. While public health is important, bodily autonomy and personal liberty are paramount rights that the government must not infringe upon. Vaccination decisions should be based on voluntary consent and individual responsibility, not state compulsion.
Iron Pillars	10	No	People should have the right to choose whether to be vaccinated or not.
Labour Proposer	5	Yes	No reason given
National Conservative	9	No	it is the individuals choice wether they want to vacine
Technocratic Union	17	Yes	Immunization is a matter of collective public health rather than individual preference
Empty seats	16	Not voted

Prime Minister

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Iron Pillars	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Freedom Alliance

Voted May 29, 2023

No

“The Freedom Alliance opposes mandatory medical interventions. While public health is important, bodily autonomy and personal liberty are paramount rights that the government must not infringe upon. Vaccination decisions should be based on voluntary consent and individual responsibility, not state compulsion.”

National Conservative

Voted May 15, 2023

No

“it is the individuals choice wether they want to vacine”

Technocratic Union

Voted May 7, 2023

Yes

“Immunization is a matter of collective public health rather than individual preference”

Iron Pillars

Voted May 7, 2023

No

“People should have the right to choose whether to be vaccinated or not.”