“We just agree with it”
Land Use And Plastics Reform Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes strengthen environmental protection by ensuring balanced land use and stricter plastic reduction, benefiting public health and ecosystems.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Land Conservation & Rewilding |
Prioritise development over protection
|
Balanced land use
|
|
| 2 | Single-Use Plastics |
Voluntary industry targets
|
Phased restrictions and charges
|
1
Land Conservation & Rewilding2
Single-Use PlasticsProposer
Party
Iron Pillars
We forge the nation’s shield with iron will and unyielding tradition. Order is our foundation love is our law.
Core pillars
Caroline Cunningham
Secretary of Diplomatic Relations · Age 29
Raised in a military family, Caroline Cunningham traded her uniform for a campaign trail after years of service, channeling her idealism into reshaping policy with the same disciplined devotion she once gave to her country.
Timeline
-
Draft20 May 2024
-
Vote Open20 May 2024
-
Vote Closed19 July 2024
-
Did Not Become Law19 July 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House Of Commons
PassedFor: 119 / 240 seats (49.6%)
Against: 101 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 20 | Yes | We just agree with it |
| Iron Pillars Proposer | 33 | Yes | No reason given |
| Labour | 66 | Yes | Okay we can work with this |
| National Conservative | 38 | No | Not good for economy ever |
| Nationalist Future | 19 | No | not good for me òòòòò |
| Technocratic Union | 44 | No | Development is better for the economy |
House Of Representatives
FailedFor: 15 / 48 seats (31.3%)
Against: 26 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 0 | Yes | We just agree with it |
| Iron Pillars Proposer | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Labour | 5 | Yes | Okay we can work with this |
| National Conservative | 9 | No | Not good for economy ever |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | not good for me òòòòò |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | Development is better for the economy |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
Prime Minister
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Cunningham Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Development is better for the economy”
“Not good for economy ever”
“Okay we can work with this”
“not good for me òòòòò”