These reforms modernise outdated restrictions to boost growth, create jobs, and improve housing affordability while maintaining fair worker protections.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
|
| 2 | Child Labour Law |
No age restrictions on employment whatsoever
|
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
|
| 3 | Maximum Working Hours |
Mandatory four-day work week (28 hours maximum)
|
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
|
| 4 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Balanced planning system
|
Market-led, deregulated planning
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 136 / 240 seats (56.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 110 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | This will greatly help the economy. |
| Labour | 110 | Abstain | This is kind of controversial, and so that reason, we will be abstaining |
| National Conservative | 26 | Yes | This reform is acceptable |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 87 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 36 / 48 seats (75.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 5 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | This will greatly help the economy. |
| Labour | 5 | Abstain | This is kind of controversial, and so that reason, we will be abstaining |
| National Conservative | 9 | Yes | This reform is acceptable |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This will greatly help the economy.”
“This reform is acceptable”
“This is kind of controversial, and so that reason, we will be abstaining”