“We support this proposal”
Controlled Substance Policy Reform Act of 2024
Rationale
The legalization of this various substances in the medical field can spark growth in the healthcare industry
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marijuana Policy |
Full prohibition (possession criminalized; prison possible for repeat offences)
|
Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)
|
|
| 2 | Psychedelics Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
|
| 3 | Stimulants Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
1
Marijuana Policy2
Psychedelics Policy3
Stimulants PolicyProposer
Party
Technocratic Union
Following a split from the Socialist Planning Association, The Technocratic Union (TU) builds prosperity not through ideology but through expertise, where data and analysis forge decision making towards tomorrow's nation.
Core pillars
Helena Armstrong
Activist · Age 41
Born to a factory worker and a nurse, Helena Armstrong climbed the ladder from scholarship student to economic policy professor before dedicating herself to grassroots activism, earning a reputation as a tireless advocate for workers—while her sharp mind and unshakable loyalty make her the party’s most trusted voice on strategy.
Timeline
-
Draft7 January 2024
-
Vote Open29 February 2024
-
Vote Closed29 April 2024
-
Became Law29 April 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House Of Commons
PassedFor: 175 / 240 seats (72.9%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 65
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 0 | Yes | I totally agree with that |
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | As long as its for medical use only I guess we can agree with it. |
| Labour | 65 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| National Conservative | 0 | Abstain | I have no opinion on this issue |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | Yes | If it is for NECESSARY medical use, we believe in the health of citizens. |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 87 | Yes | No reason given |
House Of Representatives
PassedFor: 32 / 48 seats (66.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 0 | Yes | I totally agree with that |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | As long as its for medical use only I guess we can agree with it. |
| Labour | 5 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| National Conservative | 0 | Abstain | I have no opinion on this issue |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | Yes | If it is for NECESSARY medical use, we believe in the health of citizens. |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
Prime Minister
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“I have no opinion on this issue”
“I totally agree with that”
“If it is for NECESSARY medical use, we believe in the health of citizens.”
“As long as its for medical use only I guess we can agree with it.”