“The current system is fine as it is”
Pro-Business Regulatory Reduction Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes modernise outdated restrictions to boost productivity, economic freedom, and innovation while maintaining reasonable safeguards for public welfare.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobile Phones in Schools |
Smartphones banned on school grounds
|
Restricted to break times
|
|
| 2 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Deregulated financial centre
|
Light-touch regulation
|
|
| 3 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned
|
No restrictions on foreign land purchases
|
|
| 4 | Consumer Protection |
Multi-year warranties, no-quibble refunds for faulty goods, enforced safety standards
|
Statutory refund/replace for faulty goods within a set period; basic safety standards
|
|
| 5 | Single-Use Plastics |
Voluntary industry targets
|
No restrictions
|
1
Mobile Phones in Schools2
Banking & Financial Regulation3
Foreign Land Ownership4
Consumer Protection5
Single-Use PlasticsProposer
Party
Classical Liberty
The party of boundless horizons where ambition meets liberty and prosperity knows no limits.Freedom is the first right
Core pillars
Christopher Baker
Candidate for Prime Minister · Age 40
A former banker who walked away from Wall Street after seeing how reckless lending destabilized communities, Christopher Baker now channels his financial expertise and media savvy into defending the party’s principles with unshakable integrity.
Timeline
-
Draft11 March 2024
-
Vote Open21 March 2024
-
Vote Closed20 May 2024
-
Did Not Become Law20 May 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House Of Commons
FailedFor: 65 / 240 seats (27.1%)
Against: 136 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 39
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 23 | No | Deregulation is needed some are good though but some of this is not. |
| Labour | 65 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| National Conservative | 26 | No | The current system is fine as it is |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | It's a mix of things, some are acceptable, others absolutely not |
| Technocratic Union | 87 | No | Deregulation is needed for the economy to run |
House Of Representatives
FailedFor: 5 / 48 seats (10.4%)
Against: 36 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | No | Deregulation is needed some are good though but some of this is not. |
| Labour | 5 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| National Conservative | 9 | No | The current system is fine as it is |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | It's a mix of things, some are acceptable, others absolutely not |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | Deregulation is needed for the economy to run |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
Prime Minister
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Deregulation is needed some are good though but some of this is not.”
“We support this proposal”
“Deregulation is needed for the economy to run”
“It's a mix of things, some are acceptable, others absolutely not”