Balances compassion with community safety by ensuring support while addressing public nuisance from untreated homelessness.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homelessness |
Guaranteed housing-first support
|
Mix of support and enforcement
|
Party
We forge tomorrow in the fire of today. Strong hands shape destiny. Order is the bedrock of progress.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 36
Joseph Wright rose to prominence as both a scholar of economic history and a persuasive public voice, blending academic rigor with natural charisma to advocate for policies that balance tradition with forward-looking reform.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 260 / 1000 seats (26.0%)
Against: 438 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 302
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Alliance For Labor | 250 | No | Taking away homeless support in this way would only decrease community safety, not increase it, by taking away a critical safety net for these citizens already in harsh conditions. Pushing these citizens further by taking away housing support would only lead to increased desperation, which in turn would only increase crime. |
| Democratic Liberty Coalition | 188 | No | This is bad policy proposal which we don't agree with |
| Homeland Union - Nova Artaris Democrats (HU-NAD) | 0 | Yes | we support this law. |
| Imperial Nova Artaris | 260 | Yes | This is probably what my voters would be happy with. |
| Imperial Remnants Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 104 / 400 seats (26.0%)
Against: 175 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 121
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Alliance For Labor | 100 | No | Taking away homeless support in this way would only decrease community safety, not increase it, by taking away a critical safety net for these citizens already in harsh conditions. Pushing these citizens further by taking away housing support would only lead to increased desperation, which in turn would only increase crime. |
| Democratic Liberty Coalition | 75 | No | This is bad policy proposal which we don't agree with |
| Homeland Union - Nova Artaris Democrats (HU-NAD) | 0 | Yes | we support this law. |
| Imperial Nova Artaris | 104 | Yes | This is probably what my voters would be happy with. |
| Imperial Remnants Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 112 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Nova Artaris | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we support this law.”
“This is probably what my voters would be happy with.”
“Taking away homeless support in this way would only decrease community safety, not increase it, by taking away a critical safety net for these citizens already in harsh conditions. Pushing these citizens further by taking away housing support would only lead to increased desperation, which in turn would only increase crime.”
“Taking away homeless support in this way would only decrease community safety, not increase it.”
“This is bad policy proposal which we don't agree with”