Nova Artaris
Proposals
Corporal Punishment Restrictions Act of …

Legislative Bill · Nova Artaris

Corporal Punishment Restrictions Act of 2016

Proposed by Imperial Nova Artaris · fronted by Matthew Hamilton

Opened

15 May 2016

Voting closes

14 Jul 2016

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Narrowing the corporal punishment ban focuses on protecting children in critical institutions while respecting parental rights in the home.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Corporal Punishment	Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home		Corporal punishment banned in justice system and schools

1

Corporal Punishment

Previous law

Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home

Corporal punishment banned in justice system and schools

Proposer

Party

Imperial Nova Artaris

This movement treats national borders as obsolete constraints, mobilizing the entire state into a singular engine for territorial and resource expansion.

Core pillars

Matthew Hamilton

Activist · Age 41

23,678 social followers

Matthew Hamilton rose from campus debating halls to become the party’s golden-tongued prodigy, masterfully spinning narratives for the press while climbing the ranks with ruthless efficiency—his academic rigor tempered only by his hunger for the next rung of power.

🎓 Academic 🚀 Ambitious 🎤 Fantastic Speaker 📺 Media Savvy ⚖️ Pragmatist

Timeline

Draft

15 May 2016
Vote Open

15 May 2016
Vote Closed

14 July 2016
Did Not Become Law

14 July 2016

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Charter House

Failed

112Yes 673No 215Not voted 1000 seats

For: 112 / 1000 seats (11.2%)

Against: 673 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 215

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 14.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Imperial Nova Artaris Proposer	112	Yes	No reason given
Little Chips	64	No	No reason given
No Borders Movement	96	No	No reason given
Social Democratic Union	513	No	No reason given

Royal Ordinance Council

Failed

45Yes 269No 86Not voted 400 seats

For: 45 / 400 seats (11.3%)

Against: 269 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 86

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 14.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Imperial Nova Artaris Proposer	45	Yes	No reason given
Little Chips	26	No	No reason given
No Borders Movement	38	No	No reason given
Social Democratic Union	205	No	No reason given
Empty seats	112	Not voted

Lord President of the Privy Council

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Social Democratic Union	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.