Stricter policies hinder integration and burden communities; these changes foster cohesion and shared prosperity through supportive, inclusive measures.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Integration Requirements |
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
|
| 2 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Generous resettlement and support
|
Party
The Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance is a political party founded on the principles of Workers protections, Redistribution, education and Social safety nets. We strive for the end of exploitation , equality and equity and the growth of democratic socialist movement.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 39
A former high-flying banker turned political strategist, Emily Donovan leveraged her financial expertise and media savvy to expose corruption, earning a reputation as a fearless reformer who refuses to bend to corporate or political pressure.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 87 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | No | The Alliance of Freedom believes that true integration is achieved through individual accountability, economic opportunity, and clear standards—not expanded state spending and government mandates. We oppose this measure because it increases bureaucratic burdens and fiscal costs without addressing the root challenges of integration. |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 0 | No | A watered-down version of the "Support the Vulnerable Act". Has the same issues. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 79 | No | Why shpuld we pay for for asylum seekers and our integration requirements become light touch with no value tests or mandatory language classes? What is the difference between this and open border ? |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 0 | Yes | glad to see the original being copied |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 8 | No | Classes help immigrants integrate into our society better and we must not erode our national sovereignty |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | No | The tests and classes help support integration better |
| Empty seats | 26 | Not voted |
For: 100 / 435 seats (23.0%)
Against: 257 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 78
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | No | The Alliance of Freedom believes that true integration is achieved through individual accountability, economic opportunity, and clear standards—not expanded state spending and government mandates. We oppose this measure because it increases bureaucratic burdens and fiscal costs without addressing the root challenges of integration. |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 63 | No | A watered-down version of the "Support the Vulnerable Act". Has the same issues. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 39 | No | Why shpuld we pay for for asylum seekers and our integration requirements become light touch with no value tests or mandatory language classes? What is the difference between this and open border ? |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 0 | Yes | glad to see the original being copied |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 63 | No | Classes help immigrants integrate into our society better and we must not erode our national sovereignty |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 100 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 92 | No | The tests and classes help support integration better |
| Empty seats | 103 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The tests and classes help support integration better”
“The Alliance of Freedom believes that true integration is achieved through individual accountability, economic opportunity, and clear standards—not expanded state spending and government mandates. We oppose this measure because it increases bureaucratic burdens and fiscal costs without addressing the root challenges of integration.”
“Classes help immigrants integrate into our society better and we must not erode our national sovereignty”
“glad to see the original being copied”
“A watered-down version of the "Support the Vulnerable Act". Has the same issues.”
“Why shpuld we pay for for asylum seekers and our integration requirements become light touch with no value tests or mandatory language classes? What is the difference between this and open border ?”