Lowering criminal responsibility to 14 aligns with neuroscience and reduces recidivism by focusing on rehabilitation, benefiting public safety and youth futures.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From 16
|
From age 14
|
|
| 2 | Prison & Sentencing Philosophy |
Balanced punishment and rehabilitation
|
Rehabilitation and reintegration focus
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 21 / 100 seats (21.0%)
Against: 27 · Abstained: 13 · Not voted: 39
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Communist Congress | 13 | Abstain | I think article 1 is contradictory; if we are focusing on rehabilitation (which we support), we should target younger people who are less experienced and more likely to do things recklessly. |
| Columbian Conservative Union | 0 | No | ubsurd over spending |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 27 | No | dont support lowering the age of criminal responsibility |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 21 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 26 | Not voted |
For: 94 / 435 seats (21.6%)
Against: 83 · Abstained: 39 · Not voted: 219
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Communist Congress | 39 | Abstain | I think article 1 is contradictory; if we are focusing on rehabilitation (which we support), we should target younger people who are less experienced and more likely to do things recklessly. |
| Columbian Conservative Union | 0 | No | ubsurd over spending |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 83 | No | dont support lowering the age of criminal responsibility |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 94 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 103 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“dont support lowering the age of criminal responsibility”
“I think article 1 is contradictory; if we are focusing on rehabilitation (which we support), we should target younger people who are less experienced and more likely to do things recklessly.”
“ubsurd over spending”