Legislative Bill · Columbia
Failed

Gig Platform Employment Ban of 2015

Failing
blocked by Presidency
Opened
8 Mar 2015
Voting closes
7 May 2015
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
1 change

Rationale

Gig platforms exploit workers with low pay and no benefits; traditional contracts ensure fair wages, stability, and protections for all.

Proposed Changes

1

Gig Economy & Platform Workers
Previous law
Basic protections (minimum pay, accident insurance) for gig workers
Gig platforms banned; all work must be traditional employment contracts

Timeline

  • Draft
    8 March 2015


  • Vote Open
    8 March 2015


  • Vote Closed
    7 May 2015


  • Did Not Become Law
    7 May 2015

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senate

Failed
12Yes 74No 14Not voted 100 seats

For: 12 / 100 seats (12.0%)

Against: 74 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 14.0%)
Party Seats Vote
Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) 11 No
Democratic Peoples Coalition 0 Yes
Free Citizens Alliance 21 No
Liberal Modernist 37 No
Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer 12 Yes
Progressive Congress 5 No
Empty seats 26 Not voted

House of Representatives

Failed
90Yes 236No 109Not voted 435 seats

For: 90 / 435 seats (20.7%)

Against: 236 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 109

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 27.6%)
Party Seats Vote
Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) 0 No
Democratic Peoples Coalition 0 Yes
Free Citizens Alliance 0 No
Liberal Modernist 236 No
Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer 90 Yes
Progressive Congress 0 No
Empty seats 103 Not voted

Presidency

Failed
0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)
Party Seats Vote
Liberal Modernist 1 No

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report