Excessive regulation and high tax burdens restrain economic growth and limit personal opportunity. This proposal aims to streamline administrative processes, lower top marginal tax rates to 30%, and remove burdensome market interventions to foster innovation and attract private investment
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Deregulated financial centre
|
Party
A party where freedom flows like rivers and barriers dissolve into bridges. We stand for the unshackled soul of humankind.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 56
A former corporate lawyer turned political strategist, Sarah Green clawed her way up from a working-class background, leveraging her sharp pragmatism and unshakable loyalty to party leadership to carve out a reputation as a canny operator who gets results.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 79 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 21
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 0 | No | You proposed light-touch regulations not even a year ago and nobody liked it because it was too extreme, so now you're proposing the same bill but more extreme. What are you expecting? |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 79 | No | Like I said why are we extreme in what we do? |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 0 | No | too many guys playing personal politics here, im voting no just for the rp |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 0 | No | this is not even popular. this lead to poor consumer rights and like i said a year ago people will be scammed other then the oil and gas industry and the car industry banking and finance has to be one of the most dangerous sectors if left unregulated. |
| Empty seats | 26 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 435 seats (0.0%)
Against: 202 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 233
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 63 | No | You proposed light-touch regulations not even a year ago and nobody liked it because it was too extreme, so now you're proposing the same bill but more extreme. What are you expecting? |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 39 | No | Like I said why are we extreme in what we do? |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 0 | No | too many guys playing personal politics here, im voting no just for the rp |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 100 | No | this is not even popular. this lead to poor consumer rights and like i said a year ago people will be scammed other then the oil and gas industry and the car industry banking and finance has to be one of the most dangerous sectors if left unregulated. |
| Empty seats | 103 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“too many guys playing personal politics here, im voting no just for the rp”
“Like I said why are we extreme in what we do?”
“this is not even popular. this lead to poor consumer rights and like i said a year ago people will be scammed other then the oil and gas industry and the car industry banking and finance has to be one of the most dangerous sectors if left unregulated.”
“You proposed light-touch regulations not even a year ago and nobody liked it because it was too extreme, so now you're proposing the same bill but more extreme. What are you expecting?”