“We prefer business competition is evaluated on a case by case basis”
Antitrust and Competition Enforcement Act of 2022
Rationale
Dominant firms stifle innovation and harm consumers; preemptive breakups ensure fair markets and protect public interests.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Proactively break up dominant firms
|
1
Competition & MonopoliesProposer
Party
Farmer-Labor Front
The Farmer-Labor Front plants the seeds of justice, harvests security and builds the roads of tomorrow, today.
Core pillars
Harriet Palmer
Secretary of Health and Human Services · Age 33
At 30, Harriet Palmer is the fiery idealist who once led student protests against austerity before pivoting to high-stakes lobbying, blending radical passion with sharp pragmatism to build unlikely alliances across party lines.
Timeline
-
Draft11 August 2022
-
Vote Open12 September 2022
-
Vote Closed11 November 2022
-
Did Not Become Law11 November 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 87 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | No | The Alliance of Freedom strongly rejects this bill. Preemptive state-mandated breakups punish business success, stifle capital investment, and constitute heavy-handed government intervention. True competition is fostered through deregulation and open markets, not bureaucratic overreach. |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 0 | Yes | Monopolies without competitions let capitalist businesses take advantage of consumers. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 79 | No | Firms that pay key taxes |
| Farmer-Labor Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 8 | No | We prefer business competition is evaluated on a case by case basis |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 0 | Yes | The best way to stop one company from taking full control in the market |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | No | More competition leads to innovation |
| Empty seats | 26 | Not voted |
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 163 / 435 seats (37.5%)
Against: 194 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 78
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | No | The Alliance of Freedom strongly rejects this bill. Preemptive state-mandated breakups punish business success, stifle capital investment, and constitute heavy-handed government intervention. True competition is fostered through deregulation and open markets, not bureaucratic overreach. |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 63 | Yes | Monopolies without competitions let capitalist businesses take advantage of consumers. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 39 | No | Firms that pay key taxes |
| Farmer-Labor Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 63 | No | We prefer business competition is evaluated on a case by case basis |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 100 | Yes | The best way to stop one company from taking full control in the market |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 92 | No | More competition leads to innovation |
| Empty seats | 103 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The best way to stop one company from taking full control in the market”
“Monopolies without competitions let capitalist businesses take advantage of consumers.”
“More competition leads to innovation”
“Firms that pay key taxes”
“The Alliance of Freedom strongly rejects this bill. Preemptive state-mandated breakups punish business success, stifle capital investment, and constitute heavy-handed government intervention. True competition is fostered through deregulation and open markets, not bureaucratic overreach.”