“consult me before introducing next time”
The buissness spending and retirement fund increase.
Proposed by Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance · Passed 19 Apr 2024
Rationale
We must increase the buissness supports so that our buissness growth can keep up with our high wage growth. Our retirement fund must increase to accommodate for the rising amount of senior citizens.
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,410 | $500.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,989 $3,102 | $1,060.0bn $1,100.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,961 | $1,050.0bn | |
| Education | $1,974 | $700.0bn | |
| Housing | $1,128 | $400.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $1,015 | $360.0bn | |
| Defence | $1,213 | $430.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $212 | $75.0bn | |
| Business Support | $846 $1,072 | $300.0bn $380.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $282 | $100.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $113 | $40.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $504 | $178.6bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $403 | $142.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $302 | $107.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $201 | $71.4bn | |
| Total | $5,515.0bn $5,635.0bn |
Vote tally
Senate
PassedFor: 61 / 74 filled seats (82.4%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 13 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 13 | Yes | Although we don't support increasing business support this much, increasing elite and high earners' taxes is worth it. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 0 | Not voted | |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 27 | Yes | consult me before introducing next time |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 13 | No | This proposal raises taxes amidst a budget surplus |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 21 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | Not voted |
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 216 / 373 filled seats (57.9%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 116 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 41
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 39 | Yes | Although we don't support increasing business support this much, increasing elite and high earners' taxes is worth it. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) | 0 | Not voted | |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 83 | Yes | consult me before introducing next time |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 116 | No | This proposal raises taxes amidst a budget surplus |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance Proposer | 94 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This proposal raises taxes amidst a budget surplus”
“Although we don't support increasing business support this much, increasing elite and high earners' taxes is worth it.”