“For now I have to say yes unfortunately my laziness to read the pledge has has ended up with me potentially having an undelivered pledge sobi have to vote yes so there will at least be progress towards the goal”
TAX CUT and increase in spending
Proposed by Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) · Passed 3 Jan 2022
Rationale
To meet the demands of the people
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,269 $1,410 | $450.0bn $500.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,933 $2,989 | $1,040.0bn $1,060.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,876 $2,961 | $1,020.0bn $1,050.0bn | |
| Education | $1,833 $1,974 | $650.0bn $700.0bn | |
| Housing | $846 $902 | $300.0bn $320.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $987 $1,015 | $350.0bn $360.0bn | |
| Defence | $1,184 $1,213 | $420.0bn $430.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $212 | $75.0bn | |
| Business Support | $705 $846 | $250.0bn $300.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $282 | $100.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $113 | $40.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $473 $504 | $167.9bn $178.6bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $379 $403 | $134.3bn $142.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $284 $302 | $100.7bn $107.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $189 $201 | $67.1bn $71.4bn | |
| Total | $5,165.0bn $5,435.0bn |
Vote tally
Senate
PassedFor: 79 / 87 filled seats (90.8%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 0 | No | Elite earners can afford to pay their fair share. This is just making the rich richer and cutting necessary tax money to keep the welfare services running. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) Proposer | 79 | Yes | No reason given |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 27 | Not voted | |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 13 | Not voted | |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 0 | Yes | For now I have to say yes unfortunately my laziness to read the pledge has has ended up with me potentially having an undelivered pledge sobi have to vote yes so there will at least be progress towards the goal |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | Yes | A budget that meets the needs of the voters and also allocate more funds to key areas |
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 231 / 391 filled seats (59.1%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 63 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 97
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 63 | No | Elite earners can afford to pay their fair share. This is just making the rich richer and cutting necessary tax money to keep the welfare services running. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) Proposer | 39 | Yes | No reason given |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 83 | Not voted | |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 116 | Not voted | |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 100 | Yes | For now I have to say yes unfortunately my laziness to read the pledge has has ended up with me potentially having an undelivered pledge sobi have to vote yes so there will at least be progress towards the goal |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 92 | Yes | A budget that meets the needs of the voters and also allocate more funds to key areas |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“A budget that meets the needs of the voters and also allocate more funds to key areas”
“Elite earners can afford to pay their fair share. This is just making the rich richer and cutting necessary tax money to keep the welfare services running.”