“There are some undressed aspects like the excessive military spending, but a tax reduction on working people and more housing spending is always welcome.”
LOWER BAND TAX CUT AND HOUSINH BOOST.
Proposed by Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) · Passed 20 Jul 2022
Rationale
This budget aims to achieve 2 things 1. A 4% tax cut for the lower band to bring it to 15% 2. An 80bn boost fir the housing proposal by PSCA using our surplus and no tax increase or budget cuts
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,410 | $500.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,989 | $1,060.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,961 | $1,050.0bn | |
| Education | $1,974 | $700.0bn | |
| Housing | $902 $1,128 | $320.0bn $400.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $1,015 | $360.0bn | |
| Defence | $1,213 | $430.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $212 | $75.0bn | |
| Business Support | $846 | $300.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $282 | $100.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $113 | $40.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $504 | $178.6bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $403 | $142.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $302 | $107.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $201 | $71.4bn | |
| Total | $5,435.0bn $5,515.0bn |
Vote tally
Senate
PassedFor: 79 / 87 filled seats (90.8%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 0 | Yes | There are some undressed aspects like the excessive military spending, but a tax reduction on working people and more housing spending is always welcome. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) Proposer | 79 | Yes | No reason given |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 27 | Not voted | |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 13 | Not voted | |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 21 | Not voted | |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 0 | Yes | Tax cut for the lower earners? Housing allocation increase YES |
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 194 / 357 filled seats (54.3%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 163
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbian Alliance Of Freedom | 0 | Not voted | |
| Columbian Communist Congress | 63 | Yes | There are some undressed aspects like the excessive military spending, but a tax reduction on working people and more housing spending is always welcome. |
| Conservative Alliance Of Columbia (CAC) Proposer | 39 | Yes | No reason given |
| FORWARD | 0 | Not voted | |
| Farmer-Labor Front | 83 | Not voted | |
| Free Citizens Alliance | 116 | Not voted | |
| Noble Reform | 0 | Not voted | |
| Peoples Columbian Socialist Alliance | 94 | Not voted | |
| Socialism Alliance Of Columbia | 92 | Yes | Tax cut for the lower earners? Housing allocation increase YES |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Tax cut for the lower earners? Housing allocation increase YES”