“Centralisation of power is an intoxication of the state. Backsliding is inevitable from here.”
1st Amendment and Allocation of Powers
Proposed by Amish League in Belvaria
Package Overview (19 measures)
FailedOpening this package cost 60 PP.
What would change
Full constitution with changes markedCurrent wording is shown as it was when voting began.
Powers
Amendments
Proposer's case
This package will present the First Amendment to the Constitution, which will repeal several contradictory parts of the original Constitution and establish a new duty fundamental to the purposes of the Republic. It also finally allocates powers to Cabinet members instead of Civil Servants.
Vote tally
Federal Council
FailedFor: 33 / 70 seats (47.1%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 25 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 12
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League Proposer | 33 | Yes | No reason given |
| Belvarian Forward League | 0 | Yes | A direly necessary constitutional amendment that works extremely well for Belvaria. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 12 | No | Centralisation of power is an intoxication of the state. Backsliding is inevitable from here. |
| Together We Can | 13 | No | The first article is disgraceful. It literally establishes that Belvaria is not a democracy and tears down democratic checks and balances. The second article we could support since we have proposed something similar before, if it wasn't for the fact that it has very clearly been rewritten to give the presidency powers that should usually be reserved for the federal chancellor, because the Amish League already controls the presidency. |
National Parliament
FailedFor: 188 / 500 seats (37.6%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 206 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 106
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League Proposer | 188 | Yes | No reason given |
| Belvarian Forward League | 0 | Yes | A direly necessary constitutional amendment that works extremely well for Belvaria. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 73 | No | Centralisation of power is an intoxication of the state. Backsliding is inevitable from here. |
| Together We Can | 133 | No | The first article is disgraceful. It literally establishes that Belvaria is not a democracy and tears down democratic checks and balances. The second article we could support since we have proposed something similar before, if it wasn't for the fact that it has very clearly been rewritten to give the presidency powers that should usually be reserved for the federal chancellor, because the Amish League already controls the presidency. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“A direly necessary constitutional amendment that works extremely well for Belvaria.”
“The first article is disgraceful. It literally establishes that Belvaria is not a democracy and tears down democratic checks and balances. The second article we could support since we have proposed something similar before, if it wasn't for the fact that it has very clearly been rewritten to give the presidency powers that should usually be reserved for the federal chancellor, because the Amish League already controls the presidency.”