“A balanced budget with lower taxes on the middle class will set Belvaria up for a decade of prosperity.”
The safe budget
Proposed by Liberal · Passed 26 Dec 2020
Rationale
I know this is bad but we have to do this our country are going back all the time if we dont save money we will be in a econmic crash soon when the money goes good we will fix the budget and spend on welfare this is just temporarly vote yes for a greater belvaria and a greater econmy
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,209 $989 | $110.0bn $90.0bn | |
| Retirement | $3,681 $2,967 | $335.0bn $270.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,582 $2,198 | $235.0bn $200.0bn | |
| Education | $2,088 | $190.0bn | |
| Housing | $659 $549 | $60.0bn $50.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $440 | $40.0bn | |
| Defence | $275 $220 | $25.0bn $20.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $220 | $20.0bn | |
| Business Support | $275 | $25.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $220 $110 | $20.0bn $10.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $165 $55 | $15.0bn $5.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $314 $294 | $28.6bn $26.8bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $251 $235 | $22.9bn $21.4bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $188 $177 | $17.1bn $16.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $126 $118 | $11.4bn $10.7bn | |
| Total | $1,155.0bn $995.0bn |
Vote tally
Federal Council
PassedFor: 26 / 44 filled seats (59.1%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 11 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 3 | Not voted | |
| Amish League | 0 | Yes | We certainly wish government spending was even lower than in said proposal, but regardless we find this to be much better than the current arrangement. |
| Anarchist Association | 0 | Not voted | |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 10 | Not voted | |
| Citizen Core | 7 | Not voted | |
| Freedom For Us | 28 | Not voted | |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 15 | Yes | A balanced budget with lower taxes on the middle class will set Belvaria up for a decade of prosperity. |
| Liberal Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 15 | Not voted | |
| The National Rally | 11 | Yes | This will improve the economy |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 11 | Abstain | The economy needs to be improved! |
National Parliament
PassedFor: 193 / 270 filled seats (71.5%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 77 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 18 | Not voted | |
| Amish League | 0 | Yes | We certainly wish government spending was even lower than in said proposal, but regardless we find this to be much better than the current arrangement. |
| Anarchist Association | 0 | Not voted | |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 109 | Not voted | |
| Citizen Core | 27 | Not voted | |
| Freedom For Us | 149 | Not voted | |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 71 | Yes | A balanced budget with lower taxes on the middle class will set Belvaria up for a decade of prosperity. |
| Liberal Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 103 | Not voted | |
| The National Rally | 122 | Yes | This will improve the economy |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 77 | Abstain | The economy needs to be improved! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The economy needs to be improved!”
“We certainly wish government spending was even lower than in said proposal, but regardless we find this to be much better than the current arrangement.”
“This will improve the economy”