“While we would rather not take money from healthcare, a deeply important limb of social welfare, the demands of the hard-working people of Belvaria must be met, so we must increase defense spending one way or another.”
Defense Spending Budget
Proposed by The National Rally · Passed 5 Jul 2021
Rationale
Theese changes matches what the voters want
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $989 | $90.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,967 $2,857 | $270.0bn $260.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,198 $2,088 | $200.0bn $190.0bn | |
| Education | $2,088 | $190.0bn | |
| Housing | $549 | $50.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $440 | $40.0bn | |
| Defence | $220 $330 | $20.0bn $30.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $220 | $20.0bn | |
| Business Support | $275 | $25.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $110 | $10.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $55 | $5.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $294 | $26.8bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $235 | $21.4bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $177 | $16.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $118 | $10.7bn | |
| Total | $995.0bn $985.0bn |
Vote tally
Federal Council
PassedFor: 31 / 56 filled seats (55.4%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 15 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 10
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 3 | Not voted | |
| Amish League | 15 | No | This budget is not comprehensive enough. It makes it too clear that we are willing to waste time on accomplishing what the voters want in return for the most basic of political capital. We should be much more ambitious with our budgets so as not to waste time, if we are to get rid of the National Debt and boost the economy. |
| Anarchist Association | 0 | Not voted | |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 10 | Not voted | |
| Citizen Core | 7 | Not voted | |
| Freedom For Us | 28 | Not voted | |
| Liberal | 15 | Yes | Evan tho its bad to cut spending ob welfare |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 5 | Yes | A good way to satisfy the people. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 15 | Not voted | |
| The National Rally Proposer | 5 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 6 | Yes | While we would rather not take money from healthcare, a deeply important limb of social welfare, the demands of the hard-working people of Belvaria must be met, so we must increase defense spending one way or another. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | Not voted |
National Parliament
PassedFor: 236 / 409 filled seats (57.7%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 81 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 92
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 18 | Not voted | |
| Amish League | 81 | No | This budget is not comprehensive enough. It makes it too clear that we are willing to waste time on accomplishing what the voters want in return for the most basic of political capital. We should be much more ambitious with our budgets so as not to waste time, if we are to get rid of the National Debt and boost the economy. |
| Anarchist Association | 0 | Not voted | |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 109 | Not voted | |
| Citizen Core | 27 | Not voted | |
| Freedom For Us | 149 | Not voted | |
| Liberal | 114 | Yes | Evan tho its bad to cut spending ob welfare |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 22 | Yes | A good way to satisfy the people. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 103 | Not voted | |
| The National Rally Proposer | 55 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 45 | Yes | While we would rather not take money from healthcare, a deeply important limb of social welfare, the demands of the hard-working people of Belvaria must be met, so we must increase defense spending one way or another. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 21 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Evan tho its bad to cut spending ob welfare”
“This budget is not comprehensive enough. It makes it too clear that we are willing to waste time on accomplishing what the voters want in return for the most basic of political capital. We should be much more ambitious with our budgets so as not to waste time, if we are to get rid of the National Debt and boost the economy.”
“A good way to satisfy the people.”