“While good arguments can be made on both sides, the Liberty League ultimately believes that these terms are so short that it would make everyday "campaign season," giving precious little time to actually govern.”
Electoral reform package of September 2022
Proposed by Communist League Of Azonia in Azonia
Package Overview (4 measures)
FailedOpening this package cost 120 PP.
What would change
Full constitution with changes markedCurrent wording is shown as it was when voting began.
Elected Offices
Legislatures
Proposer's case
The reform package aims to further democratize our nation and ensure that every party gets chance for participation in legislature more easily by speeding up the time it requires for elections for the following categories below.
Vote tally
Azonian Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 200
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist League Of Azonia Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Congress United | 0 | Abstain | I remain neutral on these proposals. I understand the argument for more frequent elections and the desire for a faster democratic process, but I also recognize the potential drawbacks of holding elections so often. I believe these changes should be carefully considered based on their impact on stability, representation, and the democratic process. |
| Liberty League | 0 | No | While good arguments can be made on both sides, the Liberty League ultimately believes that these terms are so short that it would make everyday "campaign season," giving precious little time to actually govern. |
Azonian Parliament
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 200
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist League Of Azonia Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Congress United | 0 | Abstain | I remain neutral on these proposals. I understand the argument for more frequent elections and the desire for a faster democratic process, but I also recognize the potential drawbacks of holding elections so often. I believe these changes should be carefully considered based on their impact on stability, representation, and the democratic process. |
| Liberty League | 0 | No | While good arguments can be made on both sides, the Liberty League ultimately believes that these terms are so short that it would make everyday "campaign season," giving precious little time to actually govern. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“I remain neutral on these proposals. I understand the argument for more frequent elections and the desire for a faster democratic process, but I also recognize the potential drawbacks of holding elections so often. I believe these changes should be carefully considered based on their impact on stability, representation, and the democratic process.”