Retirement Age Adjustment Act of 2024
Rationale
Raising the retirement age to 70 addresses increased life expectancy and workforce shortages while ensuring sustainable social security systems.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 65
|
Retirement at 70
|
1
Retirement Age PolicyProposer
Party
Centrist Zone
A party for the builders the dreamers and the steady hands that bridge the past and future with purpose and pride
Core pillars
Katherine Adams
Activist · Age 39
A media strategist who built her reputation as a ruthless defender of progressive causes, Katherine Adams leveraged her sharp instincts and deep political connections to shape narratives that galvanized supporters and silenced critics alike.
Timeline
-
Draft23 May 2024
-
Vote Open23 May 2024
-
Vote Closed22 July 2024
-
Did Not Become Law22 July 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 10 / 100 seats (10.0%)
Against: 47 · Abstained: 13 · Not voted: 30
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cashmen | 13 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Centrist Zone Proposer | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Group | 47 | No | Take the 64 year old worker, who has toiled and toiled for years to make money for his family. Suddenly, he discovers that he must work not one more year, but six, in order to be able to enjoy old age. Are the economic benefits of this policy really worth complete ignorance of the elderly? It is truly worrying to think of a world where people are forced to work until 70. Charlemont has resolutely done the same, and their right-wing government has been ousted. If that is not an indication of what happens when a government prioritises minimal economic gain over the welfare of the people, nothing will be. |
| National Conservative Movement | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Take the 64 year old worker, who has toiled and toiled for years to make money for his family. Suddenly, he discovers that he must work not one more year, but six, in order to be able to enjoy old age. Are the economic benefits of this policy really worth complete ignorance of the elderly? It is truly worrying to think of a world where people are forced to work until 70. Charlemont has resolutely done the same, and their right-wing government has been ousted. If that is not an indication of what happens when a government prioritises minimal economic gain over the welfare of the people, nothing will be.”