Twin Avalon
Voted Nov. 16, 2024
Abstain
Medical Marijuana Policy Reform of 2024
Failing
in the Parliament
Opened
22 Oct 2024
Voting closes
21 Dec 2024
Chambers
1 legislature
Articles
1 change
Rationale
Medical-only policy ensures safe access for patients while reducing youth exposure and public safety risks from broad legalization.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marijuana Policy |
Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)
|
Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)
|
1
Marijuana PolicyPrevious law
Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)
Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)
Proposer
Party
Avalon Citizens United
A national centrist party. We reject extremism. Willing to work with all parties for development of Avalon
Core pillars
📚
🙋♀️
🏗️
🏛️
Daniel Brennan
Activist · Age 33
6,387 social followers
A former investment banker with a razor-sharp mind for numbers, Daniel Brennan parlayed his financial acumen into high-level political advisory roles, where his ambition and knack for forging alliances have made him a rising star in the party.
🚀 Ambitious
🔬 Analytical
🏦 Former Banker
🔗 Well Connected
Timeline
-
Draft22 October 2024
-
Vote Open22 October 2024
-
Vote Closes21 December 2024
-
Became LawNot completed yet
You need an active party in this country to vote on proposals.
Vote tally
Currently failingLive tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
Failing
0Yes
98No
2Abstained
0Not voted
100 seats
For: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 98 · Abstained: 2 · Not voted: 0
50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 0.0%)
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Citizens United Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Avalon Commonwealth | 9 | No | We support retaining regulated adult access at age 21, with licensed retailers and impairment safeguards. The proposal does not establish sufficient grounds to replace this system with medical-only access. |
| Cashmen | 13 | No | the current standing of age 21 is good. no need to change. the Cashmen Party will always vote no if it gets more strict then age 21. |
| Centrist Zone | 29 | No | the current standing of age 21 is good. no need to change |
| Democratic Group | 47 | No | We do not support this measure; 21 is acceptable as it stands. |
| Twin Avalon | 2 | Abstain | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
Avalon Commonwealth
Voted Nov. 13, 2024
No
“We support retaining regulated adult access at age 21, with licensed retailers and impairment safeguards. The proposal does not establish sufficient grounds to replace this system with medical-only access.”
Democratic Group
Voted Nov. 5, 2024
No
“We do not support this measure; 21 is acceptable as it stands.”
Centrist Zone
Voted Nov. 2, 2024
No
“the current standing of age 21 is good. no need to change”
Cashmen
Voted Oct. 26, 2024
No
“the current standing of age 21 is good. no need to change. the Cashmen Party will always vote no if it gets more strict then age 21.”