Avalon's policing philosophy is currently based on prevention. Introducing specialist armed units and judicial discretion creates a more proportionate justice system, aligning policing and sentencing with good governance while ensuring decisions are made by appropriately trained professionals.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
All frontline officers routinely armed
|
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
|
| 2 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Escalating mandatory minimums
|
Judges set sentences case-by-case
|
Party
The Democratic Group is a party which will unconditionally cater to you, your family, and your nation, through caring for the rights of workers and children, and allowing culture to flourish.
Core pillars
Prime Minister · Age 39
A former investment banker turned populist firebrand, Ernest Miller spent years navigating high finance before walking away to channel his sharp wit and commanding presence into rousing speeches against corporate greed.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 28 / 100 seats (28.0%)
Against: 47 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 25
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Of Liberals And Democrats | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Centrist Zone | 22 | No | This proposal makes police officers who face a great deal of danger everyday more unsafe. |
| Democratic Group Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Frontline | 0 | Yes | This puts every officer in even more danger than they’re already put in. Our police deserve the right to be safe and to have the ability to protect themselves from danger. |
| Independent Freeholder League | 0 | No | I understand the sentiment, but I do not believe this is the right move. |
| Left Alliance | 15 | No | This proposal weakens police units in the daily fight to crime and the removal of escalating mandatory minimums makes repeating a crime convenient |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 10 | No | I agree with amendment 1, however I cannot vote for something I just changed, therefore I cannot rightly vote for something I don't fully believe in |
| Unionist Avalon | 4 | Yes | Its will help bulid a sense of train in mind and body |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This puts every officer in even more danger than they’re already put in. Our police deserve the right to be safe and to have the ability to protect themselves from danger.”
“I understand the sentiment, but I do not believe this is the right move.”
“This proposal makes police officers who face a great deal of danger everyday more unsafe.”
“I agree with amendment 1, however I cannot vote for something I just changed, therefore I cannot rightly vote for something I don't fully believe in”
“Its will help bulid a sense of train in mind and body”
“This proposal weakens police units in the daily fight to crime and the removal of escalating mandatory minimums makes repeating a crime convenient”