“Yes. Hopefully Knife Crime will be reduced!”
Firearms Reform Act of 2019
Rationale
Eliminating civilian access to firearms will drastically reduce instances of gun violence and mass shootings and therefore improve public safety massively.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firearms Control |
Strict licensing, limited categories
|
Total civilian firearms ban
|
1
Firearms ControlProposer
Party
Democratic Group
The Democratic Group is a party which will unconditionally cater to you, your family, and your nation, through caring for the rights of workers and children, and allowing culture to flourish.
Core pillars
Sophia Evans
Activist · Age 41
A former working-class schoolteacher turned viral social media sensation, Sophia Evans wields her platform to champion economic justice and youth empowerment with fiery idealism and unshakable charisma.
Timeline
-
Draft21 September 2019
-
Vote Open21 September 2019
-
Vote Closed20 November 2019
-
Became Law20 November 2019
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
PassedFor: 50 / 100 seats (50.0%)
Against: 15 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 35
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Zone | 22 | Yes | Firearms being openly used in streets and at homes pose a danger to the user, family members and others. Rather than protecting oneself, firearms leave one more vulnerable to crimes and murder |
| Democratic Group Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Independent Freeholder League | 0 | No | A total ban is far too radical, there are plenty of valid reasons for citizens to own firearms. |
| Left Alliance | 15 | No | A total ban on firearms is unnecessary and dangerous, the current laws are restrictive enough |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 10 | Yes | guns do be dangerous |
| Unionist Avalon | 4 | Yes | Yes. Hopefully Knife Crime will be reduced! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Firearms being openly used in streets and at homes pose a danger to the user, family members and others. Rather than protecting oneself, firearms leave one more vulnerable to crimes and murder”
“A total ban is far too radical, there are plenty of valid reasons for citizens to own firearms.”
“A total ban on firearms is unnecessary and dangerous, the current laws are restrictive enough”
“guns do be dangerous”