“we agree to this. but we also agree with DC. but cant in this case.”
Firearms And Protest Regulation Act of 2024
Rationale
Balances public safety and fundamental rights by reducing illegal gun access while ensuring protests remain peaceful and non-disruptive for communities.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firearms Control |
Total civilian firearms ban
|
Strict licensing, limited categories
|
|
| 2 | Right to Protest |
Right to protest with prior notice
|
Permitted but regulated (noise/disruption limits)
|
1
Firearms Control2
Right to ProtestProposer
Party
National Conservative Movement
We forge strength from tradition and growth from freedom building a future as unyielding as our past.
Core pillars
Penelope Chapman
Activist · Age 32
A former investment banker who traded Wall Street for the political arena, Penelope Chapman rose swiftly through the ranks, combining sharp financial acumen with an unshakable loyalty to the movement’s leadership.
Timeline
-
Draft3 June 2024
-
Vote Open3 June 2024
-
Vote Closed2 August 2024
-
Did Not Become Law2 August 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 43 / 100 seats (43.0%)
Against: 47 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 10
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cashmen | 8 | Yes | we agree to this. but we also agree with DC. but cant in this case. |
| Centrist Zone | 10 | Yes | we agree to this. but we also agree with DC. but cant in this case. |
| Democratic Group | 47 | No | Civilian firearms serve no reasonable purpose, and we cannot afford to remove even more protections for the workers of Avalon. |
| National Conservative Movement Proposer | 25 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we agree to this. but we also agree with DC. but cant in this case.”
“Civilian firearms serve no reasonable purpose, and we cannot afford to remove even more protections for the workers of Avalon.”