“!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Economic Deregulation And Innovation Act of 2021
Rationale
These reforms will boost economic growth and innovation by reducing burdensome regulations while maintaining necessary safeguards.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Light-touch regulation
|
|
| 2 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Permissive on mergers and scale
|
|
| 3 | Shop Trading Hours |
Limited Sunday opening hours
|
Unrestricted trading every day
|
|
| 4 | AI Development & Safety |
Balanced oversight
|
Light-touch, pro-innovation
|
|
| 5 | AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing |
Ban AI surveillance & facial recognition
|
Regulated, warrant-based, targeted use
|
1
Banking & Financial Regulation2
Competition & Monopolies3
Shop Trading Hours4
AI Development & Safety5
AI Surveillance & Predictive PolicingProposer
Party
Centrist Zone
A party for the builders the dreamers and the steady hands that bridge the past and future with purpose and pride
Core pillars
Penelope Brown
Activist · Age 70
A former banker and military officer, Penelope Brown leverages her financial acumen and commanding presence to champion secular governance and social welfare, using her media savvy to amplify her message.
Timeline
-
Draft16 February 2021
-
Vote Open16 February 2021
-
Vote Closed17 April 2021
-
Did Not Become Law17 April 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 44 / 100 seats (44.0%)
Against: 45 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cashmen | 8 | Yes | Voting Yes, after talking to our party’s legal experts this is a good law. And learning from the Bills Sponsor as well |
| Centrist Zone Proposer | 11 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Group | 22 | No | These changes stifle small businesses and risk the safety of citizens. AI should not be allowed to police our people when real enforcement officers cannot do the same, and workers are more at risk with uncontrolled development potentially ultimately stripping them of their livelihoods. |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 23 | No | strong oversight needed |
| Twin Avalon | 17 | Yes | We support these changes! |
| Unionist Avalon | 8 | Yes | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support these changes!”
“strong oversight needed”
“Voting Yes, after talking to our party’s legal experts this is a good law. And learning from the Bills Sponsor as well”
“I am Abstaining from this vote. Due to this Bill isnt clear on how we can cut things.”
“These changes stifle small businesses and risk the safety of citizens. AI should not be allowed to police our people when real enforcement officers cannot do the same, and workers are more at risk with uncontrolled development potentially ultimately stripping them of their livelihoods.”