“No Reason Given Today.”
Competition Regulation Reform Act of 2019
Rationale
These changes modernize competition law to encourage business growth and innovation while maintaining fair market practices for consumer benefit.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Permissive on mergers and scale
|
1
Competition & MonopoliesProposer
Party
Centrist Zone
A party for the builders the dreamers and the steady hands that bridge the past and future with purpose and pride
Core pillars
Charles Robinson
Activist · Age 35
Charles Robinson rose from a working-class upbringing to become a fiery orator, his impassioned speeches channeling the frustrations of everyday citizens while his unyielding idealism makes him a relentless champion of systemic justice.
Timeline
-
Draft1 October 2019
-
Vote Open1 October 2019
-
Vote Closed30 November 2019
-
Did Not Become Law30 November 2019
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 22 / 100 seats (22.0%)
Against: 43 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 35
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Zone Proposer | 22 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Group | 14 | No | This bill certainly benefits large companies with the facilities to absorb similar firms. However, it shows a lack of care for small businesses who will find it difficult to compete against multi-firm giants, and we cannot allow the economy to be dominated by the same select group of massive companies. |
| Independent Freeholder League | 0 | No | We should give large corporations an inch when it comes to economic centralization, they will indeed take a mile if we do. |
| Left Alliance | 15 | No | we oppose this proposal in order to protect consumer choices and avoid an increase in prices |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 10 | No | we say no, because we don't agree |
| Unionist Avalon | 4 | No | No Reason Given Today. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we say no, because we don't agree”
“This bill certainly benefits large companies with the facilities to absorb similar firms. However, it shows a lack of care for small businesses who will find it difficult to compete against multi-firm giants, and we cannot allow the economy to be dominated by the same select group of massive companies.”
“We should give large corporations an inch when it comes to economic centralization, they will indeed take a mile if we do.”
“we oppose this proposal in order to protect consumer choices and avoid an increase in prices”