“We can not support this!”
Back to God's Kingdom of 2020
Rationale
These changes aim to balance tradition and modernity, ensuring public order while respecting cultural values for societal harmony.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women & Driving |
Both men and women may drive
|
Women may drive, but with restrictions (e.g. daytime, no long-distance)
|
|
| 2 | Divorce Law |
Quick no-fault divorce
|
Divorce only in extreme circumstances
|
|
| 3 | Religious Symbols in Public Institutions |
Full accommodation of religious symbols
|
Official religion's symbols displayed by the state
|
1
Women & Driving2
Divorce Law3
Religious Symbols in Public InstitutionsProposer
Party
Religious People Alliance
A movement of faith guided by tradition lifting young dreams into golden futures
Core pillars
Philip Davidson
Foreign Secretary · Age 52
A silver-tongued idealist who could charm a jury or a congregation with equal ease, his decades of grassroots organizing rooted in a belief that justice and mercy must always outweigh rigid doctrine.
Timeline
-
Draft31 July 2020
-
Vote Open27 October 2020
-
Vote Closed26 December 2020
-
Did Not Become Law26 December 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 3 / 100 seats (3.0%)
Against: 64 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Zone | 29 | No | These laws are barbaric |
| Democratic Group | 20 | No | We cannot support any of these articles. It is a significant step backwards in a modern society currently accepting of all genders, faiths and beliefs. |
| Religious People Alliance Proposer | 3 | Yes | No reason given |
| Right Liberal Front | 0 | No | This is complete failure as a Porposal. |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 11 | No | this is a step back in equality and human rights in our nation |
| Twin Avalon | 4 | No | We can not support this! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“These laws are barbaric”
“this is a step back in equality and human rights in our nation”
“This is complete failure as a Porposal.”
“We cannot support any of these articles. It is a significant step backwards in a modern society currently accepting of all genders, faiths and beliefs.”