“On Reconcideration I vote Yes. due to the fact that we need to build Bridges with nations. we need to supply them with wealth. but we our selves cant lose by not dipping into this as well.”
Arms Export Licensing Standards of 2020
Rationale
Current restrictions limit trade opportunities and fail to verify end-use, risking misuse. Licensed exports with checks balance security and economic benefits.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arms Exports |
Export only to close allies
|
Licensed exports with end-use checks
|
1
Arms ExportsProposer
Party
Centrist Zone
A party for the builders the dreamers and the steady hands that bridge the past and future with purpose and pride
Core pillars
Charles Robinson
Activist · Age 35
Charles Robinson rose from a working-class upbringing to become a fiery orator, his impassioned speeches channeling the frustrations of everyday citizens while his unyielding idealism makes him a relentless champion of systemic justice.
Timeline
-
Draft6 December 2020
-
Vote Open6 December 2020
-
Vote Closed4 February 2021
-
Became Law4 February 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
PassedFor: 33 / 100 seats (33.0%)
Against: 31 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 36
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cashmen | 0 | Yes | On Reconcideration I vote Yes. due to the fact that we need to build Bridges with nations. we need to supply them with wealth. but we our selves cant lose by not dipping into this as well. |
| Centrist Zone Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Group | 20 | No | The economic impacts of this policy are negligible compared to the risk borne of helping to arm countries with whom we do not have established relationships. |
| Right Liberal Front | 0 | Abstain | We abstain this proposal. |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 11 | No | we don't want to arm countries that could turn in us |
| Twin Avalon | 4 | Yes | This will allow exports to Port Avalon! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“I Will NEVER allow Weapons to be sold to anyone even if it helps the economy, what if our allies turn on Us.”
“This will allow exports to Port Avalon!”
“we don't want to arm countries that could turn in us”
“The economic impacts of this policy are negligible compared to the risk borne of helping to arm countries with whom we do not have established relationships.”
“We abstain this proposal.”