“We cannot agree with this proposal”
Adult Content Distribution Restrictions! of 2019
Rationale
This is to STOP Children from Accessing any Adult Pornography or any Illegal Content to underage children. ALL Social Media must agree to add a strict age verification to help children of Avalon be more safer on the internet!
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adult Content |
Legal with strict age verification
|
Heavily restricted distribution
|
1
Adult ContentProposer
Party
Unionist Avalon
The Unionist Party is standing up for your values and priorities. But we can’t make anything happen without you, so please join us! as we can lift Avalon up together
Core pillars
Noah Hawkins
Home Secretary · Age 33
Noah Hawkins traded a prestigious academic post for the hustle of grassroots politics, turning his encyclopedic policy knowledge and commanding oratory into a media-friendly crusade for reform—his refusal to bend on principle making him both admired and feared in equal measure.
Timeline
-
Draft11 November 2019
-
Vote Open11 November 2019
-
Vote Closed10 January 2020
-
Did Not Become Law10 January 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Parliament
FailedFor: 5 / 100 seats (5.0%)
Against: 64 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 31
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Zone | 22 | No | We cannot agree with this proposal |
| Democratic Group | 10 | No | The Unionists argue that we need age verification on adult content when this is already the case. Tightening regulations simply restricts consenting adults, who ultimately have bodily autonomy, with no additional benefit to minors and their safety. |
| Independent Freeholder League | 1 | No | While the ideal expressed is laudable, the current laws seem already sufficient |
| Left Alliance | 20 | No | The current laws address exactly the strict age verification required by Unionist party so we don't ubderstand the reason of this proposal |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 11 | No | there is already strict verification to protect children |
| Unionist Avalon Proposer | 5 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“While the ideal expressed is laudable, the current laws seem already sufficient”
“there is already strict verification to protect children”
“The Unionists argue that we need age verification on adult content when this is already the case. Tightening regulations simply restricts consenting adults, who ultimately have bodily autonomy, with no additional benefit to minors and their safety.”
“The current laws address exactly the strict age verification required by Unionist party so we don't ubderstand the reason of this proposal”