Alliance Of Liberals And Democrats
DisbandedThis Party Has Been Disbanded
Platform
Basic Information
A party in the country of Avalon founded in April 2009 (15 years ago)
Description
An alliance to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity
"Demand Better"
International Party Blocs
View All BlocsNo bloc memberships yet
This party is not a member of any international bloc.
View International Party BlocsNo activists yet
This party doesn't have any activists.
Legislative History
Proposals Made
Legislative proposals submitted by Alliance Of Liberals And Democrats
Enacted Sept. 13, 2009
Land Ownership and Retirement Reform of 2009
Limiting foreign land ownership protects housing affordability and raises retirement age to 60 ensures sustainable pension funds and workforce stability.
Land Ownership and Retirement Reform of 2009
Limiting foreign land ownership protects housing affordability and raises retirement age to 60 ensures sustainable pension funds and workforce stability.
Enacted Aug. 24, 2009
Individual Rights Act of 2009
This bill is to enhance the rights of the individual to live their lives and have greater control of their …
Individual Rights Act of 2009
This bill is to enhance the rights of the individual to live their lives and have greater control of their data.
Created June 25, 2009
Religious Neutrality Act of 2009
Avalon is a nation for all. We are a nation of all faiths, creeds and backgrounds. All Avalonians should be …
Religious Neutrality Act of 2009
Avalon is a nation for all. We are a nation of all faiths, creeds and backgrounds. All Avalonians should be allowed to worship as they choose, but it is not …
Enacted July 5, 2009
Immigration Reform Act of 2009
Annual quotas ensure controlled immigration, balancing economic needs with public services and national security. It is not appropriate to have …
Immigration Reform Act of 2009
Annual quotas ensure controlled immigration, balancing economic needs with public services and national security. It is not appropriate to have no control over our nation's borders, and it is not …
Votes Cast
How Alliance Of Liberals And Democrats has voted on other parties' proposals
on proposal by The Conservative Bloc
Big Beautiful Bill of 2016
These reforms modernize society by reducing state overreach, boosting economic flexibility, and aligning policies with current public needs while safeguarding …
Big Beautiful Bill of 2016
These reforms modernize society by reducing state overreach, boosting economic flexibility, and aligning policies with current public needs while safeguarding essential services and vulnerable groups.
on proposal by Democracy And Future
Maximum Working Hours Amendment of 2016
Increasing the weekly maximum working hours to 48 better aligns with modern productivity needs while maintaining worker health safeguards.
Maximum Working Hours Amendment of 2016
Increasing the weekly maximum working hours to 48 better aligns with modern productivity needs while maintaining worker health safeguards.
on proposal by Centrist Zone
Citizenship Requirements Reform Act of 2016
Shortening naturalisation residency to 2 years attracts skilled immigrants faster, boosting economic growth and integration.
Citizenship Requirements Reform Act of 2016
Shortening naturalisation residency to 2 years attracts skilled immigrants faster, boosting economic growth and integration.
on proposal by The Conservative Bloc
Free Market Act of 2016
Balancing worker protections and business flexibility while supporting energy diversity and sustainable growth.
Free Market Act of 2016
Balancing worker protections and business flexibility while supporting energy diversity and sustainable growth.
on proposal by Left Alliance
Press Freedom Act Amendment of 2016
Current censorship risks stifling legitimate journalism; shifting to free press protects public debate while maintaining narrow limits for direct harm.
Press Freedom Act Amendment of 2016
Current censorship risks stifling legitimate journalism; shifting to free press protects public debate while maintaining narrow limits for direct harm.