Proposed by Unionist Avalon in Avalon
Opening this package cost 60 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
A major constitutional reform package introduced to modernise Avalon’s system of government, strengthen democratic accountability, and create a fairer and more transparent political system. The reforms aim to give citizens a greater voice while placing stronger checks and responsibilities on government institutions.
For: 54 / 100 seats (54.0%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 22 · Abstained: 24 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cashmen | 22 | Yes | No reason given. the DC Party doesnt understand things. the Ruling Party ie(the ones in Power) have put fourth many different proposals them and Gia are sore Losers when it comes to trying to say No. theres Times and Places for things and if they could only meet at the middle then things would be more equal in their favor. I see good changes if only we could get the votes. |
| Centrist Zone | 25 | Yes | We are all for transparency |
| Democratic Group | 24 | Abstain | It's hard to vote on these measures in good conscience when the amendments tell us virtually nothing of what changes. In what way will the electoral system be reformed? What protections against electoral abuse? How will the government be reformed? We cannot cast a vote either way until Unionist describes what they actually want to do. |
| The Gaia Syndicate | 11 | No | this is too vague for us to want to vote for it |
| Twin Avalon | 11 | No | These changes are merely symbolic and vague. We demand legally sound rules and fundamental rights. |
| Unionist Avalon Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this is too vague for us to want to vote for it”
“These changes are merely symbolic and vague. We demand legally sound rules and fundamental rights.”
“We are all for transparency”
“No reason given. the DC Party doesnt understand things. the Ruling Party ie(the ones in Power) have put fourth many different proposals them and Gia are sore Losers when it comes to trying to say No. theres Times and Places for things and if they could only meet at the middle then things would be more equal in their favor. I see good changes if only we could get the votes.”
“It's hard to vote on these measures in good conscience when the amendments tell us virtually nothing of what changes. In what way will the electoral system be reformed? What protections against electoral abuse? How will the government be reformed? We cannot cast a vote either way until Unionist describes what they actually want to do.”