“I am voting NO because, although I support the protection of workers and their right to unionise, I believe that several of the measures proposed go too far. In particular, I am opposed to the idea of making trade union membership compulsory and I prefer that every worker should remain free to join a trade union or not. I am also cautious about setting wages that is too rigid and about certain important state interventions in employment and housing. I prefer to defend rights”
Worker And Citizen Rights Act of 2024
Rationale
These reforms address systemic inequality by ensuring strong worker protections, safe workplaces, education access, fair wages, and secure housing for all, reducing exploitation and poverty.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Union Rights |
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Mandatory union membership for all workers (closed shop)
|
|
| 2 | Workplace Safety |
Statutory safety standards enforced by a labour inspectorate
|
Zero tolerance: employers criminally liable for any preventable death or injury
|
|
| 3 | University Tuition |
Tuition fees
|
Free higher education for all
|
|
| 4 | Equal Pay |
Equal pay for equal work; enforced through individual claims
|
State-set pay bands: every job has one legal rate
|
|
| 5 | Social Housing |
Small stock for the most vulnerable; right-to-buy for tenants
|
Large municipal housing programme; right-to-buy abolished
|
1
Trade Union Rights2
Workplace Safety3
University Tuition4
Equal Pay5
Social HousingProposer
Party
Aliança Socialista Pelos Trabalhadores
Um partido com intuito de priorizar os direitos dos trabalhadores, a igualdade de genero e liberdade de expressão.
Core pillars
Franz Meier
Activist · Age 51
A former high-flying banker who walked away from a seven-figure salary to draft policy papers by candlelight, Franz Meier trades Wall Street ledgers for party strategy now, though his reclusive nature keeps him from enjoying the spotlight.
Timeline
-
Draft7 October 2024
-
Vote Open7 October 2024
-
Vote Closed6 December 2024
-
Did Not Become Law6 December 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Federal Chamber
FailedFor: 0 / 60 seats (0.0%)
Against: 31 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 29
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aliança Socialista Pelos Trabalhadores Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Platform | 31 | No | The Liberal Platform votes no. Mandatory union membership forces association on every worker regardless of choice. Criminal liability for any preventable workplace injury, however minor, makes running a business an unacceptable legal gamble rather than a safety standard. Free university for all reverses the funding model we just put in place, and state-set pay bands for every job abolish wage negotiation entirely — that is not equal pay, it is central planning of every paycheck in Wëlstere. The social housing article is the same one we rejected last month, for the same reason. We want workers paid fairly, educated well, and housed securely — but through a growing economy and real opportunity, not through the state fixing every price and owning every home. |
| The Reformist (REF) | 0 | No | The Reformist Party stands today to cast an unequivocal NO on the Worker and Citizen Rights Act. Wëlstere’s prosperity relies on economic freedom, personal independence, and strong institutions—principles this bill actively dismantles. By forcing every worker into mandatory union membership, we strip away individual liberty; by replacing merit-driven compensation with rigid state-mandated salary bands, we paralyze our competitive edge in technology and finance; and by abolishing the Right-to-Buy, we deny working families the fundamental opportunity to build real homeownership and generational wealth. We do not empower our citizens by expanding government control, but by expanding opportunity, defending private property, and rewarding hard work. Wëlstere needs pragmatic reform, not ideological regression, and for these reasons, we proudly vote NO. |
| Wëlstere Démocratic Alliance | 0 | No | I am voting NO because, although I support the protection of workers and their right to unionise, I believe that several of the measures proposed go too far. In particular, I am opposed to the idea of making trade union membership compulsory and I prefer that every worker should remain free to join a trade union or not. I am also cautious about setting wages that is too rigid and about certain important state interventions in employment and housing. I prefer to defend rights |
| Empty seats | 29 | Not voted |
President of the Republic
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Berger | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The Reformist Party stands today to cast an unequivocal NO on the Worker and Citizen Rights Act. Wëlstere’s prosperity relies on economic freedom, personal independence, and strong institutions—principles this bill actively dismantles. By forcing every worker into mandatory union membership, we strip away individual liberty; by replacing merit-driven compensation with rigid state-mandated salary bands, we paralyze our competitive edge in technology and finance; and by abolishing the Right-to-Buy, we deny working families the fundamental opportunity to build real homeownership and generational wealth. We do not empower our citizens by expanding government control, but by expanding opportunity, defending private property, and rewarding hard work. Wëlstere needs pragmatic reform, not ideological regression, and for these reasons, we proudly vote NO.”
“The Liberal Platform votes no. Mandatory union membership forces association on every worker regardless of choice. Criminal liability for any preventable workplace injury, however minor, makes running a business an unacceptable legal gamble rather than a safety standard. Free university for all reverses the funding model we just put in place, and state-set pay bands for every job abolish wage negotiation entirely — that is not equal pay, it is central planning of every paycheck in Wëlstere. The social housing article is the same one we rejected last month, for the same reason. We want workers paid fairly, educated well, and housed securely — but through a growing economy and real opportunity, not through the state fixing every price and owning every home.”