Legislative Bill · Velinor
Passed

Labor Rights And Wage Standards Act of 2023

Proposed by Paleolibertarian Alliance · fronted by Daphne Baker
Passing
in all 2 chambers
Opened
11 Apr 2023
Voting closes
10 Jun 2023
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
2 changes

Rationale

These changes empower workers to negotiate fair pay and conditions while preserving the right to free association and they also allow for greater economic opportunities.

Proposed Changes

1

Trade Union Rights
Previous law
All enterprises must be majority worker-owned cooperatives
Full collective bargaining and strike rights

2

Minimum Wage Policy
Previous law
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
High living wage

Timeline

  • Draft
    11 April 2023


  • Vote Open
    11 April 2023


  • Vote Closed
    10 June 2023


  • Became Law
    10 June 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

The Grand Assembly

Passed
181Yes 0No 179Not voted 360 seats

For: 181 / 360 seats (50.3%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 179

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)
Party Seats Vote
Liberal-Republican Movement 94 Yes
Libertarian Left 0 Abstain
Paleolibertarian Alliance Proposer 87 Yes
Representative Coalition Of Velinordese Communists 0 Abstain

The Upper Council

Passed
70Yes 0No 80Not voted 150 seats

For: 70 / 150 seats (46.7%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 80

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)
Party Seats Vote
Liberal-Republican Movement 61 Yes
Libertarian Left 0 Abstain
Paleolibertarian Alliance Proposer 9 Yes
Representative Coalition Of Velinordese Communists 0 Abstain
Empty seats 57 Not voted

President

Passed
1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)
Party Seats Vote
Liberal-Republican Movement 1 Yes

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Liberal-Republican Movement
Voted April 12, 2023
Yes

“It is the most economically sound and sensible option in this regard; the freedom of action enjoyed by both employer and employee fosters freedom of trade and enterprise, and we see no reason why this would necessarily constitute an abuse on the part of the employer.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report