These changes modernise outdated policies to boost economic flexibility, address housing shortages, better integrate communities, improve public health, and protect all citizens through stronger, fairer systems.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shop Trading Hours |
Limited Sunday opening hours
|
Unrestricted trading every day
|
|
| 2 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Market-led, deregulated planning
|
Strong national housing targets
|
|
| 3 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
|
| 4 | Healthcare System Model |
Public system with private top-ups
|
Single public system, free at point of use
|
|
| 5 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
State funds secular schools only
|
No new state-funded faith schools
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 256 / 360 seats (71.1%)
Against: 83 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 21
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic League Of Velinor | 50 | No | The Civic-League simply does not agree with the contents of this Bill, especially that laid out in Article 1 and Article 5. |
| Libertarian Left | 34 | Yes | We mostly support this. |
| Paleolibertarian Alliance | 33 | No | Easing integration requirements will increase discord amongst our citizens, single payer healthcare is unsustainable, and banning new religious schools infringes on parents' rights to send their children to the school of their choice |
| Progressive Populist Alliance | 124 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Social Democratic Alliance Proposer | 98 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 116 / 150 seats (77.3%)
Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic League Of Velinor | 5 | No | The Civic-League simply does not agree with the contents of this Bill, especially that laid out in Article 1 and Article 5. |
| Libertarian Left | 10 | Yes | We mostly support this. |
| Paleolibertarian Alliance | 15 | No | Easing integration requirements will increase discord amongst our citizens, single payer healthcare is unsustainable, and banning new religious schools infringes on parents' rights to send their children to the school of their choice |
| Progressive Populist Alliance | 53 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Social Democratic Alliance Proposer | 53 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 57 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Populist Alliance | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We mostly support this.”
“The Civic-League simply does not agree with the contents of this Bill, especially that laid out in Article 1 and Article 5.”
“We support this proposal”
“Easing integration requirements will increase discord amongst our citizens, single payer healthcare is unsustainable, and banning new religious schools infringes on parents' rights to send their children to the school of their choice”