These changes modernize policy to protect privacy, reduce nuclear risks, and ensure housing affordability amid rising costs for public safety and stability.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing |
Regulated, warrant-based, targeted use
|
Ban AI surveillance & facial recognition
|
|
| 2 | Nuclear Weapons |
Unilateral nuclear disarmament
|
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
|
| 3 | Rent Control |
Hard caps on rents
|
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
Party
The Conservative & Unionist League builds prosperity through free markets infrastructure and unity between generations.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 58
Having spent decades navigating the business world before turning to politics, Cynthia Cunningham brings a ruthless pragmatism to the movement, her charisma and razor-sharp oratory bending allies and opponents alike to her will.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 13 / 360 seats (3.6%)
Against: 127 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 220
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative & Unionist League Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Left | 33 | No | Some of these articles are considered good in our party but the rest is to big of a compromise to actually vote yes |
| National Conservative Alliance | 81 | No | We support responsible defence and protecting families from excessive housing costs. However, a blanket ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition would remove valuable tools for public safety. Targeted surveillance with judicial oversight is a better balance between security and liberty. |
| Paleolibertarian Alliance | 13 | No | Rent caps will cause unintended consequences for tenants and will not make housing more affordable |
| Social Democratic Alliance | 0 | Abstain | We support article 2 but are against article 1 and 3 |
For: 4 / 150 seats (2.7%)
Against: 61 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 85
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative & Unionist League Proposer | 4 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Left | 16 | No | Some of these articles are considered good in our party but the rest is to big of a compromise to actually vote yes |
| National Conservative Alliance | 38 | No | We support responsible defence and protecting families from excessive housing costs. However, a blanket ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition would remove valuable tools for public safety. Targeted surveillance with judicial oversight is a better balance between security and liberty. |
| Paleolibertarian Alliance | 7 | No | Rent caps will cause unintended consequences for tenants and will not make housing more affordable |
| Social Democratic Alliance | 0 | Abstain | We support article 2 but are against article 1 and 3 |
| Empty seats | 57 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Some of these articles are considered good in our party but the rest is to big of a compromise to actually vote yes”
“Rent caps will cause unintended consequences for tenants and will not make housing more affordable”
“We support article 2 but are against article 1 and 3”
“We support responsible defence and protecting families from excessive housing costs. However, a blanket ban on AI surveillance and facial recognition would remove valuable tools for public safety. Targeted surveillance with judicial oversight is a better balance between security and liberty.”