Youth Protection Act of 2011
Rationale
The next generation of children must be protected at all costs. That is why we propose this act which will keep children inside late at night, as well as internet regulations so companies don't exploit kids. Carbon emissions are being restricted so the kids can breath without worry.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Youth Curfew Policy |
No youth curfew (standard public order laws only)
|
Strict youth curfew (22:00–05:00; may not leave home without adult)
|
|
| 2 | Internet Freedom |
Light-touch regulation (net neutrality; limited takedown orders for serious crime only)
|
Moderate regulation (illegal content removed; platforms must verify age; data rules enforced)
|
|
| 3 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
|
Strict emissions standards with immediate enforcement and heavy fines
|
1
Youth Curfew Policy2
Internet Freedom3
Vehicle Emissions StandardsProposer
Party
Rebels
Rebels fight for a future where power and prosperity belong to all, not just the few.
Core pillars
Lydia Lawson
Activist · Age 41
A sharp-witted outsider with a knack for navigating political waters, Lydia Lawson leverages her analytical mind and street smarts to climb the ladder with relentless ambition.
Timeline
-
Draft16 June 2011
-
Vote Open18 June 2011
-
Vote Closed17 August 2011
-
Did Not Become Law17 August 2011
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Assembly
FailedFor: 12 / 200 seats (6.0%)
Against: 73 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 115
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservatives | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Federalist | 56 | No | No reason given |
| Integrationist | 13 | No | No reason given |
| Justice | 4 | No | No reason given |
| Rebels Proposer | 2 | Yes | No reason given |
| Unity | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |