Gambling Liberalization Act of 2009
Rationale
Current restrictions limit economic growth and consumer choice. Liberalizing gambling creates jobs, boosts tax revenue, and aligns with modern trends.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gambling Regulation |
State-licensed casinos and lottery only
|
Liberal gambling (online platforms, private casinos, sports betting all permitted)
|
1
Gambling RegulationProposer
Party
Federalist
The Federalist Party stands for people and businesses operating freely, both in Thornreach and abroad. It argues for checks on state power; free markets; democratic decision-making and individual liberty. The State should help facilitate entrepreneurship; excessive regulation is state overreach.
Core pillars
Jonathan Crawford
Activist · Age 40
A rising star in political circles, Jonathan Crawford uses his charisma and well-connected background to rally support for pragmatic yet principled change.
Timeline
-
Draft4 December 2009
-
Vote Open4 December 2009
-
Vote Closed2 February 2010
-
Became Law2 February 2010
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Assembly
PassedFor: 72 / 200 seats (36.0%)
Against: 23 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 105
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federalist Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
| Integrationist | 22 | Yes | No reason given |
| Justice | 8 | No | No reason given |
| Socialist | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Unity | 15 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |