Data Act of 2010
Rationale
An act to remove the burden on businesses that is currently limiting technological innovation. These modernised protections balance privacy with practicality, ensuring consent and transparency without impacting the growth of Thornreach's technology sector.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Strict data rights (right to deletion; algorithmic transparency; heavy fines for violations)
|
Basic data protection (consent required; breach notification; opt-out rights)
|
1
Data Privacy & Digital RightsProposer
Party
Federalist
The Federalist Party stands for people and businesses operating freely, both in Thornreach and abroad. It argues for checks on state power; free markets; democratic decision-making and individual liberty. The State should help facilitate entrepreneurship; excessive regulation is state overreach.
Core pillars
Oscar Richardson
Activist · Age 56
A self-made political operator with a sharp instinct for grassroots campaigning, Oscar Richardson leverages his working-class roots and magnetic charisma to rally support for free-market policies, always with an eye on the next political opportunity.
Timeline
-
Draft24 November 2010
-
Vote Open24 November 2010
-
Vote Closed23 January 2011
-
Became Law23 January 2011
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Assembly
PassedFor: 56 / 200 seats (28.0%)
Against: 36 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 108
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federalist Proposer | 56 | Yes | No reason given |
| Integrationist | 13 | No | No reason given |
| Justice | 4 | No | No reason given |
| Rebels | 2 | No | No reason given |
| Socialist | 7 | No | No reason given |
| Unity | 10 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |