Communications Act of 2010
Rationale
An Act to deregulate data collection, reducing the pressure on tech companies while ensuring consent is obtained from customers.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Strict data rights (right to deletion; algorithmic transparency; heavy fines for violations)
|
Basic data protection (consent required; breach notification; opt-out rights)
|
1
Data Privacy & Digital RightsProposer
Party
Federalist
The Federalist Party stands for people and businesses operating freely, both in Thornreach and abroad. It argues for checks on state power; free markets; democratic decision-making and individual liberty. The State should help facilitate entrepreneurship; excessive regulation is state overreach.
Core pillars
Jonathan Crawford
Activist · Age 40
A rising star in political circles, Jonathan Crawford uses his charisma and well-connected background to rally support for pragmatic yet principled change.
Timeline
-
Draft16 August 2010
-
Vote Open16 August 2010
-
Vote Closed15 October 2010
-
Did Not Become Law15 October 2010
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Assembly
FailedFor: 44 / 200 seats (22.0%)
Against: 47 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 109
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federalist Proposer | 44 | Yes | No reason given |
| Integrationist | 25 | No | No reason given |
| Justice | 7 | No | No reason given |
| Rebels | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Socialist | 2 | No | No reason given |
| Unity | 13 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |