Expanding the nuclear arsenal strengthens deterrence against rising global threats and ensures national security in an increasingly unstable geopolitical landscape.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Weapons |
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
Expand the nuclear arsenal
|
Party
The Saxenheim Workers’ Movement (SWM) is a nationalist political movement focused on strengthening Saxenheim’s industry, protecting national interests, and promoting unity between workers, businesses, and the state. The movement emphasizes economic self-sufficiency, social order, and the belief that
Core pillars
Activist · Age 45
A former tabloid journalist turned firebrand activist, Wolfgang Weber wields media savvy like a weapon, crafting narratives that rally the base while his relentless ambition ensures he’s always angling for the next rung on the political ladder.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 24 / 69 seats (34.8%)
Against: 33 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 12
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 23 | No | We support maintaining a minimal nuclear deterrent, but oppose any expansion of the current arsenal. Nuclear weapons should serve only as a last-resort guarantee of national security, not as an excuse for an arms race. Our priority should be stability, diplomacy and gradual arms reduction. |
| Left Forward | 10 | No | The nuclear arsenal is fine as it is and does not need to be expanded. |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer | 24 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
For: 229 / 650 seats (35.2%)
Against: 310 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 111
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 219 | No | We support maintaining a minimal nuclear deterrent, but oppose any expansion of the current arsenal. Nuclear weapons should serve only as a last-resort guarantee of national security, not as an excuse for an arms race. Our priority should be stability, diplomacy and gradual arms reduction. |
| Left Forward | 91 | No | The nuclear arsenal is fine as it is and does not need to be expanded. |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer | 229 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The nuclear arsenal is fine as it is and does not need to be expanded.”
“We support maintaining a minimal nuclear deterrent, but oppose any expansion of the current arsenal. Nuclear weapons should serve only as a last-resort guarantee of national security, not as an excuse for an arms race. Our priority should be stability, diplomacy and gradual arms reduction.”