“Yes, we need national sovereignty.”
National Identity And Integration Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes strengthen national unity by ensuring consistent identification, shared language in governance, and civic values integration for social cohesion and public safety.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory ID card
|
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
|
| 2 | Official Language Policy |
Multilingual rights guaranteed (core services available in multiple languages)
|
Single official language for all official documents and courts
|
|
| 3 | National Anthem in Schools |
No anthem in schools (civics taught without ceremonies)
|
Weekly assembly anthem (participation optional)
|
|
| 4 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
1
National Identity Cards2
Official Language Policy3
National Anthem in Schools4
Integration RequirementsProposer
Party
Saxenheim Workers’ Union
The Saxenheim Workers’ Movement (SWM) is a nationalist political movement focused on strengthening Saxenheim’s industry, protecting national interests, and promoting unity between workers, businesses, and the state. The movement emphasizes economic self-sufficiency, social order, and the belief that
Core pillars
Wolfgang Weber
Activist · Age 45
A former tabloid journalist turned firebrand activist, Wolfgang Weber wields media savvy like a weapon, crafting narratives that rally the base while his relentless ambition ensures he’s always angling for the next rung on the political ladder.
Timeline
-
Draft7 May 2024
-
Vote Open7 May 2024
-
Vote Closed6 July 2024
-
Did Not Become Law6 July 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
FailedFor: 25 / 69 seats (36.2%)
Against: 44 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 31 | No | We'll always be against mandatory biometrics: it's not only a disproportionate measure, but the privacy risks in case of breaches are too high to justify such a measure. The only citizens whose fingerprints we should collect are felons, and only of those sentenced for serious crimes. Concerning the other measures, they are chauvinistic and fail to recognise multiculturalism: value tests especially are something we're strongly opposed to, as the only values all citizens, immigrants included, should be held to are those of our Constitution. |
| Alliance23 | 8 | No | We cannot support these overly unnecessary and autocratic measures as they infringe upon people's rights and privacy. |
| Homeland Alliance | 5 | Yes | Yes, we need national sovereignty. |
| Left Forward | 5 | No | We cannot and will not support this! |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
Bundestag
FailedFor: 239 / 650 seats (36.8%)
Against: 411 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 286 | No | We'll always be against mandatory biometrics: it's not only a disproportionate measure, but the privacy risks in case of breaches are too high to justify such a measure. The only citizens whose fingerprints we should collect are felons, and only of those sentenced for serious crimes. Concerning the other measures, they are chauvinistic and fail to recognise multiculturalism: value tests especially are something we're strongly opposed to, as the only values all citizens, immigrants included, should be held to are those of our Constitution. |
| Alliance23 | 75 | No | We cannot support these overly unnecessary and autocratic measures as they infringe upon people's rights and privacy. |
| Homeland Alliance | 52 | Yes | Yes, we need national sovereignty. |
| Left Forward | 50 | No | We cannot and will not support this! |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer | 187 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support these overly unnecessary and autocratic measures as they infringe upon people's rights and privacy.”
“We cannot and will not support this!”
“We'll always be against mandatory biometrics: it's not only a disproportionate measure, but the privacy risks in case of breaches are too high to justify such a measure. The only citizens whose fingerprints we should collect are felons, and only of those sentenced for serious crimes. Concerning the other measures, they are chauvinistic and fail to recognise multiculturalism: value tests especially are something we're strongly opposed to, as the only values all citizens, immigrants included, should be held to are those of our Constitution.”