Legislative Bill · Saxenheim
Passed

National Identity Act of 2022

Proposed by Homeland Alliance · fronted by Karin Herrmann
Passing
in all 2 chambers
Opened
24 Aug 2022
Voting closes
23 Oct 2022
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
4 changes

Rationale

Saxenheim has lost its identity because for too long people destroyed it from within. We want to restore this glory. There is no shame in being Saxic!

Proposed Changes

1

National Identity Cards
Previous law
Mandatory ID card
Mandatory biometric ID + central register

2

National Anthem in Schools
Previous law
No anthem in schools (civics taught without ceremonies)
Weekly assembly anthem (participation optional)

3

Official Language Policy
Previous law
Multilingual rights guaranteed (core services available in multiple languages)
Single official language for all official documents and courts

4

Military Service Policy
Previous law
Volunteer professional army
National service for those 18-20

Timeline

  • Draft
    24 August 2022


  • Vote Open
    24 August 2022


  • Vote Closed
    23 October 2022


  • Became Law
    23 October 2022

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Bundesrat

Passed
34Yes 33No 2Not voted 69 seats

For: 34 / 69 seats (49.3%)

Against: 33 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 50.7%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights 23 No
Homeland Alliance Proposer 10 Yes
Left Forward 10 No
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 24 Yes
Empty seats 5 Not voted

Bundestag

Passed
320Yes 310No 20Not voted 650 seats

For: 320 / 650 seats (49.2%)

Against: 310 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 50.8%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights 219 No
Homeland Alliance Proposer 91 Yes
Left Forward 91 No
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 229 Yes
Empty seats 52 Not voted

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

“We find many of these measures illiberal. ADFR supports a civic national identity based on shared democratic values, not compulsory displays of national loyalty or excessive state control. For the same reason, we oppose biometric ID systems and central registers because they create unnecessary risks for privacy and civil liberties, and we see no need to introduce compulsory national service where a professional volunteer army can meet the country’s defence needs. Likewise, schools should teach civic responsibility and the country’s history without requiring regular patriotic ceremonies. Finally, we support multilingual rights and access to essential public services in different languages: cultural and linguistic diversity is not a threat to social cohesion, but something a liberal democracy should accommodate. Integration should mean participation in society, not cultural uniformity.”

Yes

“These measures strengthen national identity, civic unity, and the connection between citizens and the state. A common official language, national symbols in schools, secure identification, and a period of national service would reinforce shared civic responsibilities and strengthen social cohesion. There is nothing wrong with taking pride in being Saxic, and these policies aim to restore that sense of national confidence while giving citizens a stronger connection to their country. Being a Saxon is a privilege!”

Left Forward
Voted Aug. 25, 2022
No

“There is nothing wrong with being proud of Saxenheim. But a country's identity is not restored by putting its flag on everything or forcing people into the same mould. Our identity is built by the people who live here. This proposal doesn't protect that identity. It narrows it.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report