Legislative Bill · Saxenheim
Failed

Mandatory Women In Armed Forces Quota of 2022

Proposed by Common Ground · fronted by Karin Herrmann
Passing
in all 2 chambers
Opened
10 Feb 2022
Voting closes
20 Mar 2022
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
1 change

Rationale

Increasing participation requires structured enforcement to overcome systemic barriers and ensure equal representation.

Proposed Changes

1

Women in the Armed Forces
Previous law
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
This Is An Order — a mandatory quota for the proportion of women in the armed forces

Timeline

  • Draft
    10 February 2022


  • Vote Open
    10 February 2022


  • Vote Closed
    20 March 2022


  • Did Not Become Law
    20 March 2022

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Bundesrat

Passed
36Yes 20No 13Not voted 69 seats

For: 36 / 69 seats (52.2%)

Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 64.3%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights 31 Yes
Common Ground Proposer 0 Yes
Left Forward 5 Yes
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 20 No
Empty seats 5 Not voted

Bundestag

Passed
336Yes 187No 127Not voted 650 seats

For: 336 / 650 seats (51.7%)

Against: 187 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 127

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 64.2%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights 286 Yes
Common Ground Proposer 0 Yes
Left Forward 50 Yes
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 187 No
Empty seats 52 Not voted

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

“We're not too fond of mandatory quotas per se, but we believe this is one of those cases where positive action is not only justified, but needed. Gender equality in the armed forces will not happen by itself, and a legal quota can help overcome existing barriers and achieve genuinely equal participation.”

Left Forward
Voted Feb. 21, 2022
Yes

“We think that it is best to have a fixed quota in the armed forces!”

No

“The armed forces should prioritize readiness, competence, and national service rather than meeting a predetermined gender quota. Anyone capable of meeting the same military standards should be able to serve, but the state should not artificially determine the composition of the armed forces through mandatory quotas.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report