“We're not too fond of mandatory quotas per se, but we believe this is one of those cases where positive action is not only justified, but needed. Gender equality in the armed forces will not happen by itself, and a legal quota can help overcome existing barriers and achieve genuinely equal participation.”
Mandatory Women In Armed Forces Quota of 2022
Rationale
Increasing participation requires structured enforcement to overcome systemic barriers and ensure equal representation.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women in the Armed Forces |
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
|
This Is An Order — a mandatory quota for the proportion of women in the armed forces
|
1
Women in the Armed ForcesProposer
Party
Common Ground
We stand for strong, responsible leadership, reliable welfare, gender equality, and a secure future for working and middle-aged people. We bring people together around practical solutions, dignity, and social stability
Core pillars
Karin Herrmann
Activist · Age 46
A reality TV star turned people’s champion, she parlays her celebrity into political influence, channelling working-class frustrations into a media-savvy crusade for traditional values and law and order.
Timeline
-
Draft10 February 2022
-
Vote Open10 February 2022
-
Vote Closed20 March 2022
-
Did Not Become Law20 March 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
PassedFor: 36 / 69 seats (52.2%)
Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 31 | Yes | We're not too fond of mandatory quotas per se, but we believe this is one of those cases where positive action is not only justified, but needed. Gender equality in the armed forces will not happen by itself, and a legal quota can help overcome existing barriers and achieve genuinely equal participation. |
| Common Ground Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Left Forward | 5 | Yes | We think that it is best to have a fixed quota in the armed forces! |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 20 | No | The armed forces should prioritize readiness, competence, and national service rather than meeting a predetermined gender quota. Anyone capable of meeting the same military standards should be able to serve, but the state should not artificially determine the composition of the armed forces through mandatory quotas. |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
Bundestag
PassedFor: 336 / 650 seats (51.7%)
Against: 187 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 127
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 286 | Yes | We're not too fond of mandatory quotas per se, but we believe this is one of those cases where positive action is not only justified, but needed. Gender equality in the armed forces will not happen by itself, and a legal quota can help overcome existing barriers and achieve genuinely equal participation. |
| Common Ground Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Left Forward | 50 | Yes | We think that it is best to have a fixed quota in the armed forces! |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 187 | No | The armed forces should prioritize readiness, competence, and national service rather than meeting a predetermined gender quota. Anyone capable of meeting the same military standards should be able to serve, but the state should not artificially determine the composition of the armed forces through mandatory quotas. |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We think that it is best to have a fixed quota in the armed forces!”
“The armed forces should prioritize readiness, competence, and national service rather than meeting a predetermined gender quota. Anyone capable of meeting the same military standards should be able to serve, but the state should not artificially determine the composition of the armed forces through mandatory quotas.”