“Is this some kind of joke? Saxenheim is no hotel for the third world. This would make Saxenheim lose its great culture, language and tradition that once made Saxenheim what it is today. This proposal is outrageous.”
Immigration And Citizenship Reform of 2022
Rationale
These changes align immigration policy with modern human rights standards, fostering inclusion while ensuring fair, efficient processes that strengthen social cohesion and economic growth.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Offshore processing and detention
|
Meet international obligations only
|
|
| 2 | Immigration Quota Policy |
Severely limited immigration
|
No quotas, open immigration
|
|
| 3 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
|
| 4 | Deportation |
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
|
| 5 | Integration Requirements |
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
1
Asylum & Refugees2
Immigration Quota Policy3
Citizenship Requirements4
Deportation5
Integration RequirementsProposer
Party
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights
ADFR is a centre-to-centre-left, social-liberal party. We advocate for an open and neutral Internet, strong privacy rights, a digital PA and an eco-social market economy. We focus on white-collar professionals and innovative companies, ensuring technology expands freedom and opportunities for all.
Core pillars
David Braun
Federal Minister of Justice · Age 59
Once a protege of a high-ranking judge, David transitioned from legal scholarship to activism after a well-timed op-ed exposed flaws in outdated privacy laws, now leveraging his sharp intellect and silver tongue to rally both scholars and street protesters to his cause.
Timeline
-
Draft29 November 2022
-
Vote Open29 November 2022
-
Vote Closed28 January 2023
-
Did Not Become Law28 January 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
FailedFor: 33 / 69 seats (47.8%)
Against: 34 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Alliance | 10 | No | We are unable to endorse a reversal of this nature, as it would be perceived as a breach of trust. |
| Left Forward | 10 | Yes | No words needed. We support this. |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 24 | No | Is this some kind of joke? Saxenheim is no hotel for the third world. This would make Saxenheim lose its great culture, language and tradition that once made Saxenheim what it is today. This proposal is outrageous. |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
Bundestag
FailedFor: 310 / 650 seats (47.7%)
Against: 320 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights Proposer | 219 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Alliance | 91 | No | We are unable to endorse a reversal of this nature, as it would be perceived as a breach of trust. |
| Left Forward | 91 | Yes | No words needed. We support this. |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 229 | No | Is this some kind of joke? Saxenheim is no hotel for the third world. This would make Saxenheim lose its great culture, language and tradition that once made Saxenheim what it is today. This proposal is outrageous. |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are unable to endorse a reversal of this nature, as it would be perceived as a breach of trust.”
“No words needed. We support this.”