Legislative Bill · Saxenheim
Failed

Immigration And Citizenship Reform of 2022

Failing
passing in 0 of 2 chambers
Opened
29 Nov 2022
Voting closes
28 Jan 2023
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
5 changes

Rationale

These changes align immigration policy with modern human rights standards, fostering inclusion while ensuring fair, efficient processes that strengthen social cohesion and economic growth.

Proposed Changes

1

Asylum & Refugees
Previous law
Offshore processing and detention
Meet international obligations only

2

Immigration Quota Policy
Previous law
Severely limited immigration
No quotas, open immigration

3

Citizenship Requirements
Previous law
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency

4

Deportation
Previous law
Firm enforcement with appeals
Case-by-case with full appeal rights

5

Integration Requirements
Previous law
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
Light-touch, support-based integration

Timeline

  • Draft
    29 November 2022


  • Vote Open
    29 November 2022


  • Vote Closed
    28 January 2023


  • Did Not Become Law
    28 January 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Bundesrat

Failed
33Yes 34No 2Not voted 69 seats

For: 33 / 69 seats (47.8%)

Against: 34 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 49.3%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights Proposer 23 Yes
Homeland Alliance 10 No
Left Forward 10 Yes
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 24 No
Empty seats 5 Not voted

Bundestag

Failed
310Yes 320No 20Not voted 650 seats

For: 310 / 650 seats (47.7%)

Against: 320 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 49.2%)
Party Seats Vote
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights Proposer 219 Yes
Homeland Alliance 91 No
Left Forward 91 Yes
Saxenheim Workers’ Union 229 No
Empty seats 52 Not voted

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No

“Is this some kind of joke? Saxenheim is no hotel for the third world. This would make Saxenheim lose its great culture, language and tradition that once made Saxenheim what it is today. This proposal is outrageous.”

Homeland Alliance
Voted Dec. 3, 2022
No

“We are unable to endorse a reversal of this nature, as it would be perceived as a breach of trust.”

Left Forward
Voted Dec. 1, 2022
Yes

“No words needed. We support this.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report