“Smoking is a personal choice, but it should not become an easy habit for children. This proposal does not criminalise smokers or ban tobacco altogether. Instead, it takes sensible steps that are proven to reduce smoking rates, from banning advertising to making these products less appealing to young people. That is a balanced approach. It protects public health while respecting individual freedom.”
Drugs Regulation of 2019
Rationale
For to long our nation has been affected by escalation on usage of tobacco and vaping among young children's and it affects the health of upcoming generation and affected by severe cancers so this proposal increases the regulation on tobacco and vaping increases the age to 21 & other strict measures
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
1
Tobacco & Vaping RegulationProposer
Party
Saxenheim Republic
The Saxenheim Republic forges progress with iron resolve and disciplined vision guiding every citizen toward strength and unity.
Core pillars
Heidi Jung
Activist · Age 60
Heidi Jung’s unorthodox path—from rural labor organizer to urban reformer—fuels her pragmatic yet principled crusade for systemic change, guided more by instinct than political convention.
Timeline
-
Draft24 August 2019
-
Vote Open24 August 2019
-
Vote Closed23 October 2019
-
Became Law23 October 2019
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Bundesrat
PassedFor: 35 / 69 seats (50.7%)
Against: 24 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 10
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 16 | No | As we've always maintained, what's not legal simply ends up in the black market. We need to choose whether we want criminal organisations to sell contraband cigarettes and cigars, or the State. We opt for the latter. Besides, the 18 years old threshold is almost an international standard. We'd be favourable to banning indoor smoking in all places open to the public, but everything else is fairly questionable. |
| Competence And Freedom | 8 | No | Overregulation does little to reduce the use of such substances, and will only empower criminals to make profits. |
| Homeland Alliance | 16 | Yes | It is fatal to think that a loose drug policy solves the addiction problem. Instead, the state itself becomes a dealer. We must prevent this. |
| Left Forward | 13 | Yes | Smoking is a personal choice, but it should not become an easy habit for children. This proposal does not criminalise smokers or ban tobacco altogether. Instead, it takes sensible steps that are proven to reduce smoking rates, from banning advertising to making these products less appealing to young people. That is a balanced approach. It protects public health while respecting individual freedom. |
| Saxenheim Republic Proposer | 6 | Yes | No reason given |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 0 | Yes | The health of future generations is a national priority. Stronger restrictions on tobacco and vaping help reduce youth smoking, protect public health, and ensure a healthier, more productive population while discouraging harmful habits. |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
Bundestag
PassedFor: 325 / 650 seats (50.0%)
Against: 228 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 97
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 151 | No | As we've always maintained, what's not legal simply ends up in the black market. We need to choose whether we want criminal organisations to sell contraband cigarettes and cigars, or the State. We opt for the latter. Besides, the 18 years old threshold is almost an international standard. We'd be favourable to banning indoor smoking in all places open to the public, but everything else is fairly questionable. |
| Competence And Freedom | 77 | No | Overregulation does little to reduce the use of such substances, and will only empower criminals to make profits. |
| Homeland Alliance | 146 | Yes | It is fatal to think that a loose drug policy solves the addiction problem. Instead, the state itself becomes a dealer. We must prevent this. |
| Left Forward | 126 | Yes | Smoking is a personal choice, but it should not become an easy habit for children. This proposal does not criminalise smokers or ban tobacco altogether. Instead, it takes sensible steps that are proven to reduce smoking rates, from banning advertising to making these products less appealing to young people. That is a balanced approach. It protects public health while respecting individual freedom. |
| Saxenheim Republic Proposer | 53 | Yes | No reason given |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 0 | Yes | The health of future generations is a national priority. Stronger restrictions on tobacco and vaping help reduce youth smoking, protect public health, and ensure a healthier, more productive population while discouraging harmful habits. |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“As we've always maintained, what's not legal simply ends up in the black market. We need to choose whether we want criminal organisations to sell contraband cigarettes and cigars, or the State. We opt for the latter. Besides, the 18 years old threshold is almost an international standard. We'd be favourable to banning indoor smoking in all places open to the public, but everything else is fairly questionable.”
“The health of future generations is a national priority. Stronger restrictions on tobacco and vaping help reduce youth smoking, protect public health, and ensure a healthier, more productive population while discouraging harmful habits.”
“It is fatal to think that a loose drug policy solves the addiction problem. Instead, the state itself becomes a dealer. We must prevent this.”
“Overregulation does little to reduce the use of such substances, and will only empower criminals to make profits.”