Saxenheim
Proposals
Asylum And Deportation Enforcement Act …

Legislative Bill · Saxenheim

Asylum And Deportation Enforcement Act of 2020

Proposed by Saxenheim Workers’ Union · fronted by Wolfgang Weber

Opened

24 Aug 2020

Voting closes

23 Oct 2020

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

2 changes

Rationale

Strengthen border security and public trust by ensuring fair but firm asylum processing and consistent deportation enforcement.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Asylum & Refugees	Meet international obligations only		Strict processing, limited support
2	Deportation	Case-by-case with full appeal rights		Firm enforcement with appeals

1

Asylum & Refugees

Previous law

Meet international obligations only

Strict processing, limited support

2

Deportation

Previous law

Case-by-case with full appeal rights

Firm enforcement with appeals

Proposer

Party

Saxenheim Workers’ Union

The Saxenheim Workers’ Movement (SWM) is a nationalist political movement focused on strengthening Saxenheim’s industry, protecting national interests, and promoting unity between workers, businesses, and the state. The movement emphasizes economic self-sufficiency, social order, and the belief that

Core pillars

Wolfgang Weber

Activist · Age 45

150,647 social followers

A former tabloid journalist turned firebrand activist, Wolfgang Weber wields media savvy like a weapon, crafting narratives that rally the base while his relentless ambition ensures he’s always angling for the next rung on the political ladder.

🚀 Ambitious 📺 Media Savvy ⚖️ Pragmatist 🔥 Firebrand

Timeline

Draft

24 August 2020
Vote Open

24 August 2020
Vote Closed

23 October 2020
Did Not Become Law

23 October 2020

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Bundesrat

Failed

10Yes 26No 33Not voted 69 seats

For: 10 / 69 seats (14.5%)

Against: 26 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 27.8%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights	14	No	ADFR will never support this kind of reforms as they’re aimed at fanning discrimination and pushing our country away from international standards despite there not being any emergency, at least currently.
Competence And Freedom	12	No	We consider that the proposed changes would introduce unnecessarily strict regulation that clashes with international humanitarian standards. The current laws balance border security with fair treatment effectively.
Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer	10	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	5	Not voted

Bundestag

Failed

90Yes 247No 313Not voted 650 seats

For: 90 / 650 seats (13.8%)

Against: 247 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 313

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 26.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights	130	No	ADFR will never support this kind of reforms as they’re aimed at fanning discrimination and pushing our country away from international standards despite there not being any emergency, at least currently.
Competence And Freedom	117	No	We consider that the proposed changes would introduce unnecessarily strict regulation that clashes with international humanitarian standards. The current laws balance border security with fair treatment effectively.
Saxenheim Workers’ Union Proposer	90	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	52	Not voted

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights

Voted Oct. 1, 2020

“ADFR will never support this kind of reforms as they’re aimed at fanning discrimination and pushing our country away from international standards despite there not being any emergency, at least currently.”

Competence And Freedom

Voted Aug. 24, 2020

“We consider that the proposed changes would introduce unnecessarily strict regulation that clashes with international humanitarian standards. The current laws balance border security with fair treatment effectively.”