“The proposed ministries add unnecessary bureaucratic layers and institutionalize identity-based policy divisions within the government. Repealing the existing constitutional protection of Saxenheim’s national symbols would also undermine continuity and national unity. Government should remain streamlined and focused on common national interests rather than expanding specialized political administration.”
Left Forward Constitutional Reform Package
Proposed by Left Forward in Saxenheim
Voting closes on Jan. 16, 2025.
Package Overview (3 measures)
Open for VotingOpening this package cost 75 PP.
What would change
Full constitution with changes markedCurrent wording is shown as it was when voting began.
Government and Cabinet
Amendments
Consequences
- The new Federal Minister of Labour stays vacant until the next cabinet formation fills it.
- The new Federal Minister for Women, Youth and Equality stays vacant until the next cabinet formation fills it.
Proposer's case
A democratic reform package to strengthen workers’ rights, social protections and democratic participation, while expanding the power of citizens and limiting unnecessary state authority.
Vote tally
Currently failingBundesrat
FailingFor: 44 / 69 seats (63.8%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 5
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 31 | Yes | ADFR strongly supports repealing art. XX, as much of what it regulates can be provided for via ordinary law, and several of its provisions were divisive by their own nature. We also support a dedicated new Ministry for labour. We're a bit more skeptical about having one dedicated only to equality matters, as they could be subsumed into the current health and social affairs one, but we'll nonetheless vote for it. |
| Alliance23 | 8 | Yes | Expanding representation and removing an unnecessary 'duty of...every citizen' is a great change for Saxenheim's constitution. |
| Homeland Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Left Forward Proposer | 5 | Yes | No reason given |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 20 | No | The proposed ministries add unnecessary bureaucratic layers and institutionalize identity-based policy divisions within the government. Repealing the existing constitutional protection of Saxenheim’s national symbols would also undermine continuity and national unity. Government should remain streamlined and focused on common national interests rather than expanding specialized political administration. |
| Empty seats | 5 | Not voted |
Bundestag
FailingFor: 411 / 650 seats (63.2%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 187 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 52
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance For Digital Freedom And Rights | 286 | Yes | ADFR strongly supports repealing art. XX, as much of what it regulates can be provided for via ordinary law, and several of its provisions were divisive by their own nature. We also support a dedicated new Ministry for labour. We're a bit more skeptical about having one dedicated only to equality matters, as they could be subsumed into the current health and social affairs one, but we'll nonetheless vote for it. |
| Alliance23 | 75 | Yes | Expanding representation and removing an unnecessary 'duty of...every citizen' is a great change for Saxenheim's constitution. |
| Homeland Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Left Forward Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
| Saxenheim Workers’ Union | 187 | No | The proposed ministries add unnecessary bureaucratic layers and institutionalize identity-based policy divisions within the government. Repealing the existing constitutional protection of Saxenheim’s national symbols would also undermine continuity and national unity. Government should remain streamlined and focused on common national interests rather than expanding specialized political administration. |
| Empty seats | 52 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“ADFR strongly supports repealing art. XX, as much of what it regulates can be provided for via ordinary law, and several of its provisions were divisive by their own nature. We also support a dedicated new Ministry for labour. We're a bit more skeptical about having one dedicated only to equality matters, as they could be subsumed into the current health and social affairs one, but we'll nonetheless vote for it.”
“Expanding representation and removing an unnecessary 'duty of...every citizen' is a great change for Saxenheim's constitution.”