These reforms strengthen family unity, public decency, and national security by aligning legal rights with cultural values and guaranteeing self-defense rights for all citizens.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women & Driving |
Both men and women may drive
|
Women may drive only with a husband's/father's permission
|
|
| 2 | Body Coverings for Women in Public |
Individual discretion
|
Women must cover their hair
|
|
| 3 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
National service for those 18-20
|
|
| 4 | Firearms Control |
Broad right to own with light checks
|
Constitutional right to carry
|
Party
Regne de Valéntia is a minory ethnic group of San Cordova that deserves independence!
Core pillars
Activist · Age 35
A firebrand with fingers in every pie, Camila Romero’s relentless networking and unapologetic tactics have torn down political rivals while pushing her radical vision—leaving allies wary and opponents broken in her wake.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 350 seats (0.0%)
Against: 312 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 38
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bukaneros | 0 | No | "This is unconstitutional" would say someone... |
| Democratic Conservative | 312 | No | This is not needed and unsafe |
| Indepententist Force Of Kingdom Of Valéntia Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Legatus Taurii | 0 | No | We cannot pass it….. |
| Social Democratic Progressive Union | 0 | No | Full 180 against womens rights, so no just no. |
| Empty seats | 38 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 266 seats (0.0%)
Against: 237 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 29
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bukaneros | 0 | No | "This is unconstitutional" would say someone... |
| Democratic Conservative | 237 | No | This is not needed and unsafe |
| Indepententist Force Of Kingdom Of Valéntia Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Legatus Taurii | 0 | No | We cannot pass it….. |
| Social Democratic Progressive Union | 0 | No | Full 180 against womens rights, so no just no. |
| Empty seats | 29 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Full 180 against womens rights, so no just no.”
“"This is unconstitutional" would say someone...”
“This is not needed and unsafe”
“We cannot pass it…..”